Some inequalities for sums of nonnegative definite matrices in quaternions
- PDF / 561,714 Bytes
- 10 Pages / 468 x 680 pts Page_size
- 16 Downloads / 228 Views
		    Some matrix versions of the Cauchy-Schwarz and Frucht-Kantorovich inequalities are established over the quaternionic algebra. As applications, a group of inequalities for sums of Hermitian nonnegative definite matrices over the quaternionic algebra are derived. Let a = a0 + a1 i + a2 j + a3 k be a quaternion, where a0 ,...,a3 are numbers from the real field R and the three imaginary units i, j, and k satisfy i2 = j 2 = k2 = −1,
 
 i j = − ji = k,
 
 jk = −k j = i,
 
 ki = −ik = j.
 
 (1)
 
 The collection of all quaternions is denoted by H and is called the real quaternionic algebra. This algebra was first introduced by Hamilton in 1843 (see [5, 6]), and is often called the Hamilton quaternionic algebra. It is well known that H is an associative division algebra over R. For any a = a0 + a1 i + a2 j + a3 k ∈ H, the conjugate of a = a0 + a1 i + a2 j + a3 k is defined to be a = a0 − a1 i − a2 j − a3 k, which satisfies a = a,
 
 a + b = a + b,
 
 ab = ba √
 
 (2) 
 
 √
 
 for all a,b ∈ H. The norm of a is defined to be |a| = aa = aa = a20 + a21 + a22 + a23 . Let A = (ast ) be an m × n matrix over H, where ast ∈ H. The conjugate transpose of A is defined to be A∗ = (ats ). A square matrix A over H is called Hermitian if A∗ = A. General properties of matrices over H can be found in [13, 18]. Because H is noncommutative, one cannot directly extend various results on complex numbers to quaternions. On the other hand, H is known to be algebraically isomorphic to the two matrix algebras consisting of 
 
 ψ(a) =  def
 
 a0 + a1 i a2 − a3 i
 
   − a2 + a3 i  ∈ C2×2 , a0 − a1 i
 
 
 
 a0 a def  1 φ(a) =   a2 a3
 
 Copyright © 2005 Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Inequalities and Applications 2005:5 (2005) 449–458 DOI: 10.1155/JIA.2005.449
 
 −a1
 
 a0 a3 −a2
 
 −a2 −a3
 
 a0 a1
 
 −a3
 
 
 
 a2    ∈ R4×4 , −a1  a0 (3)
 
 450
 
 Inequalities for matrices
 
 respectively. Moreover, it is shown in [13] that the diagonal matrix diag(a,a) satisfies the following universal similarity factorization equality (USFE): P diag(a,a)P ∗ = ψ(a),
 
 (4)
 
 where 
 
  −i
 
 1 1 P= √ − j 2
 
 (5)
 
 k
 
 is a unitary matrix over H, that is, PP ∗ = P ∗ P = I2 ; the diagonal matrix diag(a,a,a,a) satisfies the following USFE: Q diag(a,a,a,a)Q∗ = φ(a),
 
 (6)
 
 where the matrix Q has the following independent expression: 
 
 1
 
 1  −i Q = Q∗ =  2 − j −k
 
 
 
 i 1 −k j
 
 j k k − j  , 1 i  −i 1
 
 (7)
 
 which is a unitary matrix over H. The two equalities in (4) and (6) reveal two fundamental facts that the quaternion a is an eigenvalue of multiplicity two for the complex matrix ψ(a) and an eigenvalue of multiplicity four for the real matrix φ(a). In general, for any m × n matrix A = A0 + A1 i + A2 j + A3 k ∈ Hm×n , where A0 ,...,A3 ∈ m R ×n , the block-diagonal matrix diag(A,A) satisfies the following universal factorization equality: 
 
 
 
 A0 + A1 i − A2 + A3 i P2m diag(A,A)P2n = A2 − A3 i A0 − A1 i
 
  def
 
 ∗
 
 = Ψ(A) ∈ C2m×2n ,
 
 (8)
 
 ∗ where P2m and P2n are the following two unitary matrices over H: 
 
 
 
 Im 1 2 − jIm
 
 P2m = √
 
 −iIm
 
 kIm
 
  
 
 
 
 ,
 
 ∗
 
 1 In 2 iIn
 
 P2n = √
 
 
 
 jIn . −kIn
 
 (9		
Data Loading...
 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	