Some inequalities for sums of nonnegative definite matrices in quaternions

  • PDF / 561,714 Bytes
  • 10 Pages / 468 x 680 pts Page_size
  • 16 Downloads / 187 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


Some matrix versions of the Cauchy-Schwarz and Frucht-Kantorovich inequalities are established over the quaternionic algebra. As applications, a group of inequalities for sums of Hermitian nonnegative definite matrices over the quaternionic algebra are derived. Let a = a0 + a1 i + a2 j + a3 k be a quaternion, where a0 ,...,a3 are numbers from the real field R and the three imaginary units i, j, and k satisfy i2 = j 2 = k2 = −1,

i j = − ji = k,

jk = −k j = i,

ki = −ik = j.

(1)

The collection of all quaternions is denoted by H and is called the real quaternionic algebra. This algebra was first introduced by Hamilton in 1843 (see [5, 6]), and is often called the Hamilton quaternionic algebra. It is well known that H is an associative division algebra over R. For any a = a0 + a1 i + a2 j + a3 k ∈ H, the conjugate of a = a0 + a1 i + a2 j + a3 k is defined to be a = a0 − a1 i − a2 j − a3 k, which satisfies a = a,

a + b = a + b,

ab = ba √

(2) 



for all a,b ∈ H. The norm of a is defined to be |a| = aa = aa = a20 + a21 + a22 + a23 . Let A = (ast ) be an m × n matrix over H, where ast ∈ H. The conjugate transpose of A is defined to be A∗ = (ats ). A square matrix A over H is called Hermitian if A∗ = A. General properties of matrices over H can be found in [13, 18]. Because H is noncommutative, one cannot directly extend various results on complex numbers to quaternions. On the other hand, H is known to be algebraically isomorphic to the two matrix algebras consisting of 

ψ(a) =  def

a0 + a1 i a2 − a3 i

  − a2 + a3 i  ∈ C2×2 , a0 − a1 i



a0 a def  1 φ(a) =   a2 a3

Copyright © 2005 Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Inequalities and Applications 2005:5 (2005) 449–458 DOI: 10.1155/JIA.2005.449

−a1

a0 a3 −a2

−a2 −a3

a0 a1

−a3



a2    ∈ R4×4 , −a1  a0 (3)

450

Inequalities for matrices

respectively. Moreover, it is shown in [13] that the diagonal matrix diag(a,a) satisfies the following universal similarity factorization equality (USFE): P diag(a,a)P ∗ = ψ(a),

(4)

where

−i

1 1 P= √ − j 2

(5)

k

is a unitary matrix over H, that is, PP ∗ = P ∗ P = I2 ; the diagonal matrix diag(a,a,a,a) satisfies the following USFE: Q diag(a,a,a,a)Q∗ = φ(a),

(6)

where the matrix Q has the following independent expression: 

1

1  −i Q = Q∗ =  2 − j −k



i 1 −k j

j k k − j  , 1 i  −i 1

(7)

which is a unitary matrix over H. The two equalities in (4) and (6) reveal two fundamental facts that the quaternion a is an eigenvalue of multiplicity two for the complex matrix ψ(a) and an eigenvalue of multiplicity four for the real matrix φ(a). In general, for any m × n matrix A = A0 + A1 i + A2 j + A3 k ∈ Hm×n , where A0 ,...,A3 ∈ m R ×n , the block-diagonal matrix diag(A,A) satisfies the following universal factorization equality:



A0 + A1 i − A2 + A3 i P2m diag(A,A)P2n = A2 − A3 i A0 − A1 i

 def



= Ψ(A) ∈ C2m×2n ,

(8)

∗ where P2m and P2n are the following two unitary matrices over H:



Im 1 2 − jIm

P2m = √

−iIm

kIm





,



1 In 2 iIn

P2n = √



jIn . −kIn

(9