Spondylodiscitis due to transmitted mycotic aortic aneurysm or infected grafts after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
- PDF / 1,532,580 Bytes
- 12 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 102 Downloads / 171 Views
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Spondylodiscitis due to transmitted mycotic aortic aneurysm or infected grafts after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR): A retrospective single‑centre experience with short‑term outcomes Nicolas Heinz von der Höh1 · Philipp Pieroh1 · Jeanette Henkelmann2 · Daniela Branzan3 · Anna Völker1 · Dina Wiersbicki1 · Christoph‑Eckhard Heyde1 Received: 30 April 2020 / Accepted: 25 August 2020 © The Author(s) 2020
Abstract Purpose To report the challenging therapeutic approach and the clinical outcome of patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis transmitted due to infected retroperitoneal regions of primary infected mycotic aortic aneurysms (MAAs) or secondary infected aortic stent grafts after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Methods Between 2012 and 2019, all patients suffering from spondylodiscitis based on a transmitted infection after the EVAR procedure were retrospectively identified. Patient data were analysed regarding the time between primary and secondary EVAR infection and spondylodiscitis detection, potential source of infection, pathogens, antibiotic treatment, complications, recovery from infection, mortality, numeric rating scale (NRS), COBB angle and cage subsidence. Results Fifteen patients with spondylodiscitis transmitted from primary or secondary infected aortic aneurysms after EVAR were included. The median follow-up time was 8 months (range 1–47). Surgery for spondylodiscitis was performed in 12 patients. In 9 patients, the infected graft was treated conservatively. MAAs were treated in 4 patients first with percutaneous aortic stent graft implantation followed by posterior surgery of the infected spinal region in a two-step procedure. Infection recovery was recorded in 11 patients during follow-up. The overall mortality rate was 27% (n = 4). The mean pain intensity improved from an NRS score of 8.4 (3.2–8.3) to 3.1 (1.3–6.7) at the last follow-up. Conclusion EVAR was used predominantly to treat primary infected MAAs. Secondary infected grafts were treated conservatively. Independent of vascular therapy, surgery of the spine led to recovery in most cases. Thus, surgery should be considered for the treatment of EVAR- and MAA-related spondylodiscitis. Keywords Spondylodiscitis · Vertebral osteomyelitis · AAA · EVAR · Surgery
Introduction Nicolas Heinz von der Höh and Pieroh Philipp have contributed equally to this work. * Nicolas Heinz von der Höh [email protected]‑leipzig.de 1
Department of Orthopaedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstr. 18, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
2
Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstr. 18, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
3
Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thorax and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstr. 18, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
In recent years, the increase in percutaneous endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for the treatment of aortic diseases has been associated with reports of post-reconstruction complications [1, 2]
Data Loading...
