The ACTonHEART study: rationale and design of a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing a brief intervention base

  • PDF / 244,894 Bytes
  • 10 Pages / 595.28 x 793.7 pts Page_size
  • 11 Downloads / 174 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


STUDY PROTOCOL

Open Access

The ACTonHEART study: rationale and design of a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing a brief intervention based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy to usual secondary prevention care of coronary heart disease Chiara AM Spatola1,2*, Gian Mauro Manzoni1,2, Gianluca Castelnuovo1,2, Gabriella Malfatto3, Mario Facchini3, Christina L Goodwin4, Matteo Baruffi1 and Enrico Molinari1,2

Abstract Background: Modifiable risk factors, including life-style habits and psychological variables, have been increasingly demonstrated to have an important role in influencing morbidity and mortality in cardiovascular patients, and to account for approximately 90% of the population risk for cardiac events. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) has shown effectiveness in promoting healthy behaviors, and improving psychological well-being in patients with chronic physical conditions. Moreover, a first application of an acceptance-based program in cardiac patients has revealed high treatment satisfaction and initial evidences of effectiveness in increasing heart-healthy behaviour. However, no clinical trial to date has evaluated the efficacy of an acceptance-based program for the modification of cardiovascular risk factors and the improvement of psychological well-being, compared to usual secondary prevention care. Methods: Approximately 168 patients will be recruited from an outpatient cardiac rehabilitation unit and randomly assigned to receive usual care or usual care + a brief ACT-based intervention. The ACT group will be administered five group therapy sessions integrating educational topics on heart-healthy behaviours with acceptance and mindfulness skills. Participants will be assessed at baseline, six weeks later (post treatment for the ACT condition), at six and twelve months follow-up. A partially-nested design will be used to balance effects due to clustering of participants into small therapy groups. Primary outcome measures will include biological indicators of cardiovascular risk and self-reported psychological well-being. Treatment effects will be tested via multilevel modeling after which the mediational role of psychological flexibility will be evaluated. (Continued on next page)

* Correspondence: [email protected] 1 Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, Psychology Research Laboratory, Milan, Italy 2 Department of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © 2014 Spatola et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Spatola et al. Health and Quality of Li