The Concept of Argument A Philosophical Foundation
Arguing that our attachment to Aristotelian modes of discourse makes a revision of their conceptual foundations long overdue, the author proposes the consideration of unacknowledged factors that play a central role in argument itself. These are in particu
- PDF / 3,235,780 Bytes
- 499 Pages / 439.43 x 683.15 pts Page_size
- 59 Downloads / 308 Views
Harald R. Wohlrapp
The Concept of Argument A Philosophical Foundation
Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning Interdisciplinary Perspectives from the Humanities and Social Sciences Volume 4
Series Editor Shahid Rahman
For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/11547
Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning The series is developed in partnership with the Maison Européenne des Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société (MESHS) at Nord - Pas de Calais and the UMR-STL: 8163 (CNRS). Aims & Scope: The scientific objectives of the series, where humanities and social sciences are conceived as building interdisciplinary interfaces, are: This series publishes volumes that link practices in the Humanities and Social Sciences, with theories in Logic, Argumentation and Reasoning, such as: Decision theory and Action theory, Argumentation Theories in: cognitive sciences, economy, sociology, law, logic, philosophy of sciences. The series is open towards research from the Analytic and the Continental traditions, and has four main focus areas: Pragmatic models and studies that develop a dynamic approach to reasoning in which argumentation is structured as an interaction or as a game, in which two or more participants’ play moves are defined by the type of argumentation in question, communication, language and techniques of argumentation; studies between the practical and theoretical dimensions of argumentation, as well as the relationships between argumentation and other modes of communication, reception, persuasion and power; studies in which reasoning practice is considered from the point of view of its capacity to produce conviction of persuasion, and focusing on understanding what makes an argument performative; Diachronic transformations of reasoning practices studies that emphasize the invention and renewal of reasoning forms, with respect to its performance and its effectiveness. General Editor Shahid Rahman (Lille, UMR 8163) Managing Editor Laurent Keiff (Lille, UMR 8163) Area Editors Argumentation and Pragmatics Marcelo Dascal (Tel Aviv) Erik Krabbe (Groningen) Frans H. van Eemeren (Amsterdam) John Woods (British Columbia/King’s College) Argumentation and Rhetoric Fabienne Blaise (Lille, MESHS-Nord Pas de Calais) Gabriel Galvez-Behar (Lille, MESHS-Nord Pas de Calais) André Laks (Sorbonne, Paris IV) Ruth Webb (Lille, UMR 8163) Decision Theory, Mathematics, Economy Jacques Dubucs (IHPST-Paris 1) Fredéric Jouneau (Lille) Richard Sobel (Lille)
Cognitives Sciences. Computer Sciences Yann Coello (Lille) Eric Gregoire (CRIL-Lens) Henry Prakken (Utrecht) François Recanati (ENS, Paris) Epistemology and Philosophy of Science André Fuhrmann (Frankfurt) Gerhard Heinzmann (Nancy) Göran Sundholm (Leyden) Logic Michel Crubellier (Lille, UMR 8163) Dov Gabbay (King’s College) Sven Ove Hansson (Stockholm) Tero Tulenheimo (Lille, UMR 8163) Political Science and Sociology Jean-Gabriel Contamin (Lille) Franck Fischer (Rutgers) Josh Ober (Stanford) Marc Pichard (Lille, MESHS-Nord Pas de Calais)
Harald R. Wohlrapp
The Concept of Argument A Philoso
Data Loading...