The global governance of antimicrobial resistance: a cross-country study of alignment between the global action plan and
- PDF / 767,850 Bytes
- 11 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 48 Downloads / 172 Views
(2020) 16:109
RESEARCH
Open Access
The global governance of antimicrobial resistance: a cross-country study of alignment between the global action plan and national action plans Louise Munkholm*
and Olivier Rubin
Abstract Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing problem worldwide in need of global coordinated action. With the endorsement of the Global Action Plan (GAP) on AMR in 2015, the 194 member states of the World Health Organization committed to integrating the five objectives and corresponding actions of the GAP into national action plans (NAPs) on AMR. The article analyzes patterns of alignment between existing NAPs and the GAP, bringing to the fore new methodologies for exploring the relationship between globally driven health policies and activities at the national level, taking income, geography and governance factors into account. Methods: The article investigates the global governance of AMR. Concretely, two proxies are devised to measure vertical and horizontal alignment between the GAP and existing NAPs: (i) a syntactic indicator measuring the degree of verbatim overlap between the GAP and the NAPs; and (ii) a content indicator measuring the extent to which the objectives and corresponding actions outlined in the GAP are addressed in the NAPs. Vertical alignment is measured by the extent to which each NAP overlaps with the GAP. Horizontal alignment is explored by measuring the degree to which NAPs overlap with other NAPs across regions and income groups. In addition, NAP implementation is explored using the Global Database for Antimicrobial Resistance Country Self-Assessment. Findings: We find strong evidence of vertical alignment, particularly among low-income countries and lowermiddle-income countries but weaker evidence of horizontal alignment within regions. In general, we find the NAPs in our sample to be mostly aligned with the GAP’s five overarching objectives while only moderately aligned with the recommended corresponding actions. Furthermore, we see several cases of what can be termed ‘isomorphic mimicry’, characterized by strong alignment in the policies outlined but much lower levels of alignment in terms of actual implemented policies. Conclusion: To strengthen the alignment of national AMR policies, we recommend global governance initiatives based on individualized responsibilities some of which should be legally binding. Our study provides limited evidence of horizontal alignment within regions, which implies that regional governance institutions (e.g., WHO regional offices) should primarily act as mediators between global and local demands to strengthen a global governance regime that minimizes policy fragmentation and mimicry behavior across member states. Keywords: Antimicrobial resistance, National action plans, Policy alignment, Comparative research
* Correspondence: [email protected] Department of Social Sciences and Businesses, Roskilde University, Universitetsvej 1, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative
Data Loading...
