The introduction of the SRF-II method to compare hypothesis of adaptive reuse for an iconic historical building
- PDF / 2,363,003 Bytes
- 40 Pages / 439.37 x 666.142 pts Page_size
- 19 Downloads / 162 Views
The introduction of the SRF‑II method to compare hypothesis of adaptive reuse for an iconic historical building Francesca Abastante1 · Salvatore Corrente2 · Salvatore Greco2,3 · Isabella M. Lami1 · Beatrice Mecca1 Received: 24 January 2020 / Revised: 28 July 2020 / Accepted: 7 October 2020 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020
Abstract The paper shows how multiple criteria decision aiding (MCDA) tools can support the analyses of six hypotheses of adaptive reuse of an iconic historical building in Turin, Italy (called stock exchange) to identify the preferred alternative. In the last 2 years, the debate around the requalification of the building has been huge for several reasons: it is perceived as a “monument” by citizens; it shows architectural and typological values nationally recognized; it involves public and private interests. In this context, we tested the applicability of a recently proposed multicriteria decision making methodology to architecture field. This decision support approach is a conjunction of four MCDA methods, namely: multiple criteria hierarchy process (MCHP), permitting to consider structural relationships between criteria; ELECTRE III, considering three types of interaction effects between criteria (strengthening, weakening and antagonistic effects); the imprecise SRF method, supplying an easily understandable approach to collect information from the Decision Maker; and stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA), providing robust recommendation, in terms of rankings and relations of preference, indifference and incomparability between project alternatives, at each level of the hierarchy. We propose a modification of the SRF methodology, called SFR-II, to increase the reliability of the decision aid procedure, which could constitute a significant advance for the same SRF method. Keywords Multi-criteria decision aiding (MCDA) · Decision support procedures · Adaptive reuse · SRF-II method · Architecture
* Beatrice Mecca [email protected] Extended author information available on the last page of the article
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
F. Abastante et al.
1 Introduction Transforming the many urban areas and buildings abandoned in the twentieth century is often complex and problematic, as it involves multiple objectives and stakeholders—e.g. owners, investors and public Decision Makers (DMs)—who must all interact with each other. From an architectural standpoint, adaptive reuse has become a valuable approach for the sustainable rebirth of the city (Dewiyana et al. 2016; Permata et al. 2020), encouraging the reuse of existing and abandoned sites and buildings, avoiding the waste of energy and materials that new construction entails (Conejos et al. 2014; Elefante 2007), preserving a portion of the urban landscape and delivering new social and economic profits (Dewiyana et al. 2016; Dyson et al. 2016; Douglas 2006). In this framework, it is important that decision analysis and decision-making be supported by methodologies where the required inpu
Data Loading...
