The Potential for Big Data to Improve Neighborhood-Level Census Data
The promise of “big data” for those who study cities is that it offers new ways of understanding urban environments and processes. Big data exists within broader national data economies, these data economies have changed in ways that are both poorly under
- PDF / 131,837 Bytes
- 13 Pages / 439.37 x 666.142 pts Page_size
- 101 Downloads / 169 Views
Abstract The promise of “big data” for those who study cities is that it offers new ways of understanding urban environments and processes. Big data exists within broader national data economies, these data economies have changed in ways that are both poorly understood by the average data consumer and of significant consequence for the application of data to urban problems. For example, high resolution demographic and economic data from the United States Census Bureau since 2010 has declined by some key measures of data quality. For some policyrelevant variables, like the number of children under 5 in poverty, the estimates are almost unusable. Of the 56,204 census tracts for which a childhood poverty estimate was available 40,941 had a margin of error greater than the estimate in the 2007–2011 American Community Survey (ACS) (72.8 % of tracts). For example, the ACS indicates that Census Tract 196 in Brooklyn, NY has 169 children under 5 in poverty 174 children, suggesting somewhere between 0 and 343 children in the area live in poverty. While big data is exciting and novel, basic questions about American Cities are all but unanswerable in the current data economy. Here we highlight the potential for data fusion strategies, leveraging novel forms of big data and traditional federal surveys, to develop useable data that allows effective understanding of intra urban demographic and economic patterns. This paper outlines the methods used to construct neighborhood-level census data and suggests key points of technical intervention where “big” data might be used to improve the quality of neighborhood-level statistics. Keywords Census • American Community Survey • Neighborhood data • Uncertainty • Data fusion
S.E. Spielman (*) University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA e-mail: [email protected] © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 P. Thakuriah et al. (eds.), Seeing Cities Through Big Data, Springer Geography, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-40902-3_6
99
100
S.E. Spielman
1 Introduction The promise of “big data1” for those who study cities is that it offers new ways of understanding urban environments and their affect on human behavior. Big data lets one see urban dynamics at much higher spatial and temporal resolutions than more traditional sources of data, such as survey data collected by national statistical agencies. Some see the rise of big data as a revolutionary of mode of understanding cities, this “revolution” holds particular promise for academics because, as argued by Kitchin (2014), revolutions in science are often preceded by revolutions in measurement. That is, big data could give rise to something even bigger, a new science of cities. Others, such as Greenfield (2014) argue that real urban problems cannot be solved by data and are deeply skeptical of the potential for information technologies to have meaningful impacts on urban life. Here, we aim to contextualize the enthusiasm about urban big data within broader national data economies, particularly focusing on the US case. This paper a
Data Loading...
