The Realism-Antirealism Debate in the Age of Alternative Logics
The relation between logic and knowledge has been at the heart of a lively debate since the 1960s. On the one hand, the epistemic approaches based their formal arguments in the mathematics of Brouwer and intuitionistic logic. Following Michael Dummett, th
- PDF / 3,721,272 Bytes
- 352 Pages / 439.37 x 666.142 pts Page_size
- 83 Downloads / 174 Views
LOGIC, EPISTEMOLOGY, AND THE UNITY OF SCIENCE VOLUME 23
Editors Shahid Rahman, University of Lille III, France John Symons, University of Texas at El Paso, U.S.A.
Editorial Board Jean Paul van Bendegem, Free University of Brussels, Belgium Johan van Benthem, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands Jacques Dubucs, University of Paris I-Sorbonne, France Anne Fagot-Largeault, Collège de France, France Bas van Fraassen, Princeton University, U.S.A. Dov Gabbay, King’s College London, U.K. Jaakko Hintikka, Boston University, U.S.A. Karel Lambert, University of California, Irvine, U.S.A. Graham Priest, University of Melbourne, Australia Gabriel Sandu, University of Helsinki, Finland Göran Sundholm, Universiteit Leiden, The Netherlands Heinrich Wansing, Technical University Dresden, Germany Timothy Williamson, Oxford University, U.K.
Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science aims to reconsider the question of the unity of science in light of recent developments in logic. At present, no single logical, semantical or methodological framework dominates the philosophy of science. However, the editors of this series believe that formal techniques like, for example, independence friendly logic, dialogical logics, multimodal logics, game theoretic semantics and linear logics, have the potential to cast new light on basic issues in the discussion of the unity of science. This series provides a venue where philosophers and logicians can apply specific technical insights to fundamental philosophical problems. While the series is open to a wide variety of perspectives, including the study and analysis of argumentation and the critical discussion of the relationship between logic and the philosophy of science, the aim is to provide an integrated picture of the scientific enterprise in all its diversity.
For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/6936
Shahid Rahman · Giuseppe Primiero · Mathieu Marion Editors
The Realism-Antirealism Debate in the Age of Alternative Logics
123
Editors Shahid Rahman Université de Lille, UdL3 CNRS, UMR 8163: STL F-59653 Villeneuve d’Ascq France [email protected]
Dr. Giuseppe Primiero FWO, Ghent University Blandijnberg 2 Ghent Belgium IEG Oxford University Oxford UK [email protected]
Mathieu Marion Université du Québec à Montréal Département de philosophie Succursale Centre-Ville 8888 C.P. H3C 3P8 Montreal QC, Canada [email protected]
ISBN 978-94-007-1922-4 e-ISBN 978-94-007-1923-1 DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-1923-1 Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York Library of Congress Control Number: 2011937177 c Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Prin
Data Loading...
