The Relationship between Metacognitive Ability and Metacognitive Accuracy

  • PDF / 1,407,059 Bytes
  • 24 Pages / 439.37 x 666.142 pts Page_size
  • 67 Downloads / 255 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


The Relationship between Metacognitive Ability and Metacognitive Accuracy Yoonhee Jang 1 & Heungchul Lee 2 & Youngjun Kim 3 & Kyongcheon Min 3 Received: 24 March 2020 / Accepted: 1 June 2020/ # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Abstract

Judgments of learning (JOLs), as one type of metacognitive judgments, are assessments that people make about how well they have learned material. The effective use of JOLs depends on various factors, including task-specific variables and the learner’s own metacognitive resources. Little has been known about the relationship between JOL accuracy for memory predictions and metacognitive ability, which is an emerging theory-practice gap in the field of metacognition. The present study investigated the relationship between the absolute accuracy of JOLs and the metacognitive awareness inventory (MAI), using concrete and abstract word pairs through three study-test cycles. We found that participants who scored high on the MAI, also produced a high level of absolute accuracy on each study-test cycle. The results from mediation analyses yielded that the impact of the MAI on absolute accuracy on cycle 3 was completely mediated by absolute accuracy on the first two cycles for both concrete and abstract word pairs. In addition, the same pattern of results was obtained even when a subset of the MAI (either knowledge or regulation of cognition) was used. These indicate that trait-based metacognitive abilities can well explain the correspondence between JOLs and recall performance on the first test. However, their impact is reduced after study-test practice, suggesting that experience-based factors become critical to improving metacognitive accuracy. Keywords Judgments of learning . Metacognitive awareness inventory . Absolute accuracy For the last few decades, research has identified the importance of metacognition, or the ability to monitor one’s own knowledge and to regulate behavior during learning (e.g., Brown, 1987; * Yoonhee Jang [email protected]

1

Department of Psychology, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, MT 59812-1584, USA

2

Net Intelligence & Research, Seoul, South Korea

3

Department of Psychology, Ajou University, Suwon-si, South Korea

Y. Jang et al.

Nelson & Narens, 1990). There is a broad consensus that learners perform better when they monitor and regulate their cognitive processes. Much research in psychology concerns metacognitive accuracy: if one’s metacognitive judgments well predict the accuracy of task performance, they are judged to have high metacognitive accuracy. On the other hand, research in educational contexts typically refers to metacognition as an innate cognitive behavior that serves to facilitate cognitive functioning, and uses a variety of instruments, including questionnaires, to assess metacognitive abilities or skills. If one scores high on the instrument, they are judged to have good metacognitive ability. An unanswered question is whether good metacognitive ability involves a high level of