The Representation Type of Group Algebras
Throughout this paper we use the term algebra to mean finite-dimensional algebra over a fixed algebraically closed field K and the term module to mean finitely generated right module. Algebras, as is usual in representation theory, are assumed to be basic
- PDF / 1,099,946 Bytes
- 15 Pages / 481.89 x 691.654 pts Page_size
- 27 Downloads / 231 Views
		    ,
 
 ANDRZE~
 
 SKOWRONSKI
 
 NICHOLAS COPERNICUS UNIVERSITY 87~100
 
 ,
 
 TORUN, POLAND
 
 1. INTRODUCTION Throughout this paper we use the term algebra to mean finite-dimensional algebra over a fixed algebraically closed field K and the term module to mean finitely generated right module. Algebras, as is usual in representation theory, are assumed to be basic. For any algebra A we will denote by mod A the category of finitely generated les and by ind A the full subcategory of mod
 
 A
 
 A-modu~
 
 consisting
 
 of all indecomposable modules. Recall that an algebra A is called wild provided mod A has a full subcategory representation equivalent to the tegory of
 
 finite-dimensia~a~ 1 as
 
 ca~
 
 K-vector spaces, modules
 
 over the free associative algebra K(X,y) in two (non~commu~ ting)variables x andy. Further, A is of finite type if ind A has only finitely many nonisomorphic objects. If A
 
 R. Göbel et al. (eds.), Abelian Groups and Modules © Springer-Verlag Wien 1984
 
 518
 
 A. Skowronski
 
 is neither wild nor of finite type, then A is said to be tame. Drozd showed in [1,2] that an algebra A is tame if and only if A is not of finite type and for any dimension d, there exists a finite family of functors Fi: mod mod A, i
 
 = 1, ••• ,nd,
 
 where Ri
 
 = K or
 
 Ri~
 
 Ri is a rational alge-
 
 bra K[i]f of dimension 1, satisfying the conditions: (a) For each i, 1 ::l!t i ' nd, Fi
 
 = ? ® Qi
 
 where Qi is an Ri Ri-A-bimodule being a finitely generated free right Ri-module, (b) Every indecomposable A-module M of dimension d is of the form M ~ Fi(s) for some i and a simple Ri-module s. Let A be an algebra and let G be a finite group. We are concerned with the problem of determining the representation type of the group algebra AG. A characterization of group algebras AG of finite type has bean obtained in the case A
 
 = K by
 
 Higman [3] and in the general case by the
 
 author and Meltzer (4,5]. Krugliak showed in [6] that if K is of charakteristic p) 2, then the group algebras KG of noncyclic p-groups are wild, and Brenner (7] has shown that for p
 
 = 2,
 
 the group algebras KG of all 2-groups beside the
 
 cyclic, dihedral, semidihedral and quaternion groups are wild. Bondarenko [a] and Ringel [9) have indepadently shown that in characteristic 2 the group algebras of dihedral 2-groups are tame. Finally, Drozd and Bondarenko [10] have also shown that the group algebras of semidihedral and
 
 Group Algebras
 
 519
 
 and quaternion 2-groups are tame in characteristic 2 (see also [11]). In this paper we give necessary and sufficient conditions for AG to be tame where A is an arbitrary algebra and G a finite group. In order to state the main theorem we need some notationa. For any positive integer n we will denote by Xn the quiver and by Yn the oriented cycle J.n
 
 ,J.n-1/n y
 
 n
 
 n-1
 
 .•
 
 ~1 2
 
 l
 
 i
 
 •
 
 For
 
 ')1
 
 •
 
 ••
 
 •
 
 5 and any sequence of positive integers n1 , ••• ,n 8 satisfying the conditions: s ) 2, n1 > 1, n8 < n, and n~
 
 ni + 1
 
 < "i+1 '
 
 i
 
 = 1, ••• ,s-1,
 
 we will denote by A"(
 
 the bounden quiver algebra I		
Data Loading...
 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	