Toxicities with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Emerging Priorities From Disproportionality Analysis of the FDA Adverse Ev

  • PDF / 1,489,910 Bytes
  • 17 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 97 Downloads / 179 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Toxicities with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Emerging Priorities From Disproportionality Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Emanuel Raschi1   · Alessandra Mazzarella1 · Ippazio Cosimo Antonazzo1 · Nicolò Bendinelli1 · Emanuele Forcesi1 · Marco Tuccori2 · Ugo Moretti3 · Elisabetta Poluzzi1 · Fabrizio De Ponti1

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Abstract Background  Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including antibodies targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA4) and programmed cell death 1 or its ligand (PD1/PDL1), elicit different immune-related adverse events (irAEs), but their global safety is incompletely characterized. Objective  The aim of this study was to characterize the spectrum, frequency, and clinical features of ICI-related adverse events (AEs) reported to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Patients and methods  AEs from FAERS (up to June 2018) recording ICIs (ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab) as suspect were extracted. Comprehensive disproportionality analyses were performed through the reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI), using other oncological drugs as comparison. An overview of systematic reviews (OoSRs) was also undertaken to identify irAEs with consistent positive associations. Results  ICIs were recorded in 47,266 reports, submitted mainly by consumers receiving monotherapy with anti-PD1/ PDL1 drugs. Three areas of toxicity emerged from both disproportionality analysis and the OoSRs (32 studies): endocrine (N = 2863; ROR = 6.91; 95% CI 6.60–7.23), hepatobiliary (2632; 1.33; 1.28–1.39), and respiratory disorders (7240; 1.04; 1.01–1.06). Different reporting patterns emerged for anti-CTLA4 drugs (e.g., hypophysitis, adrenal insufficiency, hypopituitarism, and prescribed overdose) and anti-PD1/PDL1 agents (e.g., pneumonitis, cholangitis, vanishing bile duct syndrome, tumor pseudoprogression, and inappropriate schedule of drug administration). No increased reporting emerged when comparing combination with monotherapy regimens, but multiple hepatobiliary/endocrine/respiratory irAEs were recorded. Conclusions  This parallel approach through contemporary post-marketing analysis and OoSRs confirmed that ICIs are associated with a multitude of irAEs, with different reporting patterns between anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1/PDL1 medications. Close clinical monitoring is warranted to early diagnose and timely manage irAEs, especially respiratory, endocrine, and hepatic toxicities, which warrant further characterization; patient- and drug-related risk factors should be assessed through analytical pharmaco-epidemiological studies and prospective multicenter registries.

Ippazio Cosimo Antonazzo and Nicolò Bendinelli contributed equally. * Emanuel Raschi [email protected] 1



Pharmacology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via Irnerio 48, 40126 Bologna, Italy

2



Unit of Adverse Drug Reactions Moni