Two-year outcome comparison of decompression in 14 lipomatosis cases with 169 degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis cases:
- PDF / 1,048,270 Bytes
- 11 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 49 Downloads / 150 Views
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Two‑year outcome comparison of decompression in 14 lipomatosis cases with 169 degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis cases: a Swiss prospective multicenter cohort study Nils H. Ulrich1,5 · Isaac Gravestock1 · Sebastian Winklhofer2 · Iliya Peyneshki2 · Maria M. Wertli1,3 · Giuseppe Pichierri1,6 · Tamás F. Fekete4 · François Porchet4 · Mazda Farshad5 · Johann Steurer1 · Jakob M. Burgstaller1,6 on behalf of the LSOS Study Group Received: 22 January 2020 / Revised: 9 April 2020 / Accepted: 2 May 2020 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020
Abstract Purpose Spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL) is defined as an abnormal and extensive accumulation of unencapsulated adipose tissue within the spinal epidural space. To date, there is a lack of high-level evidence studies reporting the outcome of surgical treatment of symptomatic SEL in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). The aim was to compare clinical outcomes in patients with symptomatic LSS with and without SEL who underwent decompression surgery alone at the 12and 24-month follow-up. Methods One hundred and eighty-three patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 14 had mainly SEL on at least one level operated in addition to possible degenerative changes on other levels and 169 degenerative LSS only. The main outcomes were pain (Spinal Stenosis Measure (SSM) symptoms), disability (SSM function), and quality of life [EQ-5D-3L summary index (SI)] at 24-month follow-up, and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in SSM symptoms, SSM function, and EQ-5D-3L SI. Results The multiple regression linear models showed that SEL was associated with worse SSM symptoms (p = 0.045) and EQ-5D-3L SI scores (p = 0.026) at 24-month follow-up, but not with worse SSM function scores. Further, depression (in all models) was negatively associated with better clinical outcomes at 24-month follow-up. In the outcomes SSM symptoms and EQ-5D-3L SI, distinctly more patients in the classical LSS group reached MCID than in the SEL group (71.3% and 62.3% vs. 50.0% and 42.9%). Conclusions Our study demonstrated that decompression alone surgery was associated with significant improvement in disability in both groups at 2 years, but not in pain and quality of life in patients with SEL. Keywords Spinal epidural lipomatosis · Stenosis · Surgical decompression · Lumbar spine · Lipomatosis
Drs. Nils H. Ulrich and Isaac Gravestock contributed equally to this work. * Nils H. Ulrich [email protected] 1
Horten Centre for Patient Oriented Research and Knowledge Transfer, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
2
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
3
Division of General Internal Medicine, Bern University Hospital, Bern University, Bern, Switzerland
4
Department of Orthopedics and Neurosurgery, Spine Center, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland
5
University Spine Centre Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, S
Data Loading...
