Whose everyday climate cultures? Environmental subjectivities and invisibility in climate change discourse
- PDF / 419,550 Bytes
- 20 Pages / 439.37 x 666.142 pts Page_size
- 36 Downloads / 188 Views
Whose everyday climate cultures? Environmental subjectivities and invisibility in climate change discourse Allison Ford 1
& Kari Marie Norgaard
1
Received: 26 July 2018 / Accepted: 17 December 2019/ # Springer Nature B.V. 2020
Abstract
Public climate conversations are inattentive to how differences in social location and culture shape people’s knowledge of and responses to climate change. Instead, emphases on climate apathy and climate skepticism overrepresent privileged sensibilities, marginalizing those who fall outside of what Black feminist theorist Audre Lorde calls “the mythical norm” (1987). In so doing, predominant approaches obscure forms of climate engagement that do not resemble researcher identified pro-environmental behaviors. In order to illustrate relationships between social location, culture, and response to climate change, we apply the notion of environmental subjectivities in a secondary analysis of climate engagement in two communities, one of which resembles and one of which lies outside the “mythical” norm. Both members of the Karuk Tribe and urban homesteaders frame climate change as symptoms of unsustainable political-economic structures. Yet differences in the structural location of each community result in divergent understandings of and practices in relation to the changing climate. These divergent community understandings and practices cannot be explained by individual preferences or cultural differences alone. Instead, the concept of environmental subjectivities (1) calls attention to the situated knowledges of climate change that emerge in relation to differences of indigeneity, race, and class, (2) relates community environmental practices to interlocking power structures, and (3) illustrates how elite narratives obscure the role of the colonial, settler, capitalist state in the generation of climate emissions. Keywords Indigenous peoples . Culture . Intersectionality . Subjectivity . Cultural framing
This article is part of the Special Issue on Everyday Climate Cultures: Understanding the cultural politics of climate change^ edited by Goodman, Doyle and Farrell
* Allison Ford [email protected] Kari Marie Norgaard [email protected] Extended author information available on the last page of the article
Climatic Change
“Somewhere, on the edge of consciousness, there is what I call a mythical norm, which each one of us within our hearts knows “that is not me.“ In America, this norm is usually defined as white, thin, male, young, heterosexual, Christian, and financially secure. It is with this mythical norm that the trappings of power reside within this society.” Audre Lorde, Age, Race, Class and Sex: Women Redefining Difference.
1 Introduction: embedded assumptions in climate change discourse Climate change professionals have puzzled over how people respond to information about climate change (Leiserowitz et al. 2016; Moser 2007, 2016) on the basis that understanding will shape corrective policies. Research confirms that public understanding of climate change as anthropog
Data Loading...
