Why breed disease-resilient livestock, and how?
- PDF / 1,746,847 Bytes
- 18 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 92 Downloads / 187 Views
n e t i c s Se l e c t i o n Ev o l u t i o n
Open Access
REVIEW
Why breed disease‑resilient livestock, and how? Pieter W. Knap1* and Andrea Doeschl‑Wilson2
Abstract Background: Fighting and controlling epidemic and endemic diseases represents a considerable cost to livestock production. Much research is dedicated to breeding disease resilient livestock, but this is not yet a common objective in practical breeding programs. In this paper, we investigate how future breeding programs may benefit from recent research on disease resilience. Main body: We define disease resilience in terms of its component traits resistance (R: the ability of a host animal to limit within-host pathogen load (PL)) and tolerance (T: the ability of an infected host to limit the damage caused by a given PL), and model the host’s production performance as a reaction norm on PL, depending on R and T. Based on this, we derive equations for the economic values of resilience and its component traits. A case study on porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome (PRRS) in pigs illustrates that the economic value of increasing production in infectious conditions through selection for R and T can be more than three times higher than by selection for produc‑ tion in disease-free conditions. Although this reaction norm model of resilience is helpful for quantifying its relation‑ ship to its component traits, its parameters are difficult and expensive to quantify. We consider the consequences of ignoring R and T in breeding programs that measure resilience as production in infectious conditions with unknown PL—particularly, the risk that the genetic correlation between R and T is unfavourable (antagonistic) and that a tradeoff between them neutralizes the resilience improvement. We describe four approaches to avoid such antagonisms: (1) by producing sufficient PL records to estimate this correlation and check for antagonisms—if found, continue routine PL recording, and if not found, shift to cheaper proxies for PL; (2) by selection on quantitative trait loci (QTL) known to influence both R and T in favourable ways; (3) by rapidly modifying towards near-complete resistance or tolerance, (4) by re-defining resilience as the animal’s capacity to resist (or recover from) the perturbation caused by an infection, measured as temporal deviations of production traits in within-host longitudinal data series. Conclusions: All four alternatives offer promising options for genetic improvement of disease resilience, and most rely on technological and methodological developments and innovation in automated data generation. Background Worldwide, infectious diseases reduce production performance, fertility, and survival of livestock, and therefore form a limiting factor to the sustainability and profitability of livestock production and to carbon neutral farming, which has become a major goal in many countries. Focusing on the profitability element, Table 1 *Correspondence: [email protected] 1 Genus-PIC, 24837 Schleswig, Germany Full list of author info
Data Loading...
