Agreement between self-reported pre-pregnancy weight and measured first-trimester weight in Brazilian women
- PDF / 1,555,139 Bytes
- 13 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 44 Downloads / 175 Views
(2020) 20:734
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Open Access
Agreement between self-reported prepregnancy weight and measured firsttrimester weight in Brazilian women Thaís Rangel Bousquet Carrilho1, Kathleen M. Rasmussen2, Dayana Rodrigues Farias1, Nathalia Cristina Freitas Costa1, Mônica Araújo Batalha1, Michael E. Reichenheim3, Eric O. Ohuma4,5, Jennifer A. Hutcheon6, Gilberto Kac1* Brazilian Maternal and Child Nutrition Consortium
Abstract Background: Self-reported pre-pregnancy weight and weight measured in the first trimester are both used to estimate pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) but there is limited information on how they compare, especially in low- and middle-income countries, where access to a weight scale can be limited. Thus, the main goal of this study was to evaluate the agreement between self-reported pre-pregnancy weight and weight measured during the first trimester of pregnancy among Brazilian women so as to assess whether self-reported pre-pregnancy weight is reliable and can be used for calculation of BMI and GWG. Methods: Data from the Brazilian Maternal and Child Nutrition Consortium (BMCNC, n = 5563) and the National Food and Nutritional Surveillance System (SISVAN, n = 393,095) were used to evaluate the agreement between selfreported pre-pregnancy weight and weights measured in three overlapping intervals (30–94, 30–60 and 30–45 days of pregnancy) and their impact in BMI classification. We calculated intraclass correlation and Lin’s concordance coefficients, constructed Bland and Altman plots, and determined Kappa coefficient for the categories of BMI. Results: The mean of the differences between self-reported and measured weights was < 2 kg during the three intervals examined for BMCNC (1.42, 1.39 and 1.56 kg) and about 1 kg for SISVAN (1.0, 1.1 and 1.2 kg). Intraclass correlation and Lin’s coefficient were > 0.90 for both datasets in all time intervals. Bland and Altman plots showed that the majority of the difference laid in the ±2 kg interval and that the differences did not vary according to measured first-trimester BMI. Kappa coefficient values were > 0.80 for both datasets at all intervals. Using self-reported prepregnancy or measured weight would change, in total, the classification of BMI in 15.9, 13.5, and 12.2% of women in the BMCNC and 12.1, 10.7, and 10.2% in the SISVAN, at 30–94, 30–60 and 30–45 days, respectively. Conclusion: In Brazil, self-reported pre-pregnancy weight can be used for calculation of BMI and GWG when an early measurement of weight during pregnancy is not available. These results are especially important in a country where the majority of woman do not initiate prenatal care early in pregnancy. Keywords: Weight, Self-report, First trimester, Pregnancy, Gestational weight gain, Body mass index, Agreement
* Correspondence: [email protected] 1 Nutritional Epidemiology Observatory, Josué de Castro Nutrition Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho 373/CCS, bloco J, 2 andar, sala 29. Cidade Univers
Data Loading...
