Analysis of the brain transcriptome in lines of laying hens divergently selected for feather pecking
- PDF / 2,143,721 Bytes
- 14 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 17 Downloads / 200 Views
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Open Access
Analysis of the brain transcriptome in lines of laying hens divergently selected for feather pecking Clemens Falker-Gieske1* , Andrea Mott1, Siegfried Preuß2, Sören Franzenburg3, Werner Bessei2, Jörn Bennewitz2 and Jens Tetens1,4
Abstract Background: Feather pecking (FP) in laying hens reduces animal welfare and leads to economic losses for the layer industry. FP is considered a heritable condition that is influenced by dysregulation of neurotransmitter homeostasis, the gut microbiome, and the immune system. To identify genes and biological pathways responsible for FP behavior we compared the brain transcriptomes of 48 hens divergently selected for FP. In addition, we tested if high feather peckers (HFP) and low feather peckers (LFP) respond differently to light since light has been shown to trigger FP behavior. Results: Of approximately 48 million reads/sample an average of 98.4% were mapped to the chicken genome (GRCg6a). We found 13,070 expressed genes in the analyzed brains of which 423 showed differential expression between HFP and LFP. Genes of uncertain function and non-coding RNAs were overrepresented among those transcripts. Functional analyses revealed the involvement of cholinergic signaling, postsynaptic activity, membrane channels, and the immune system. After the light stimulus, 28 genes were found to be differentially expressed. These included an interaction cluster of core components of the circadian clock. However, differences in the response to light between HFP and LFP were not detectable. Conclusions: Genes involved in cholinergic signaling, channel activity, synaptic transmission, and immune response were found to be involved in FP behavior. We propose a model in which the gut microbiota modulates the immune system, which in turn affects cholinergic signaling. This might have an influence on monoamine signaling with possible involvement of GABA or glutamate signaling. Keywords: Feather pecking, Circadian clock, Brain transcriptome, Chicken, RNA-sequencing
Background Feather pecking (FP) is a serious problem of the layer industry causing economic losses and massive impairments of animal welfare. The propensity to perform this damaging behavior is a complex trait influenced by numerous environmental factors as well as a genetic component. Reported heritability estimates of around * Correspondence: [email protected] 1 Department of Animal Sciences, Georg-August-University, Burckhardtweg 2, 37077 Göttingen, Germany Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
0.15 [1–3] indicate the possibility of genetic selection against FP. Despite intensive research during the last decades, the underlying mechanisms are still not well understood. A longstanding theory explained FP as a redirected foraging behavior [4, 5], which was not confirmed in later studies. Instead, it has been linked to general locomotor activity [6, 7] and feather eating [7, 8]. With respect to the latter, it was reported that the inclusion of feathers in
Data Loading...
