Comparing health-related quality of life and burden of care between early-onset scoliosis patients treated with magnetic
- PDF / 622,048 Bytes
- 7 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 104 Downloads / 191 Views
CASE SERIES
Comparing health‑related quality of life and burden of care between early‑onset scoliosis patients treated with magnetically controlled growing rods and traditional growing rods: a multicenter study Hiroko Matsumoto1 · David L. Skaggs2 · Behrooz A. Akbarnia3 · Jeff B. Pawelek3 · Tricia St. Hilaire4 · Sonya Levine1 · Peter Sturm5 · Francisco Javier Sanchez Perez‑Grueso6 · Scott J. Luhmann7 · Paul D. Sponseller8 · John T. Smith9 · Klane K. White10 · Michael G. Vitale1 · Pediatric Spine Study Group4 Received: 28 April 2020 / Accepted: 20 July 2020 © Scoliosis Research Society 2020
Abstract Study design Multicenter retrospective cohort study. Objectives To compare pre-operative and post-operative EOSQ-24 scores in magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) and traditional growing rod (TGR) patients. Summary of background data Since the introduction of MCGR, early-onset scoliosis patients have been afforded a reduction in the number of surgeries compared to the TGR technique. However, little is known about (health-related quality of life) and burden of care outcomes between these surgical techniques. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study using a multicenter registry on patients with EOS undergoing MCGR or TGR between 2008 and 2017. The EOSQ-24 was administered at preoperative and postoperative 2-year assessments. The EOSQ24 scores were compared between MCGR and TGR as well as preoperatively and postoperatively within each procedure. Results 110 patients were analyzed in this study (TGR, N = 32; MCGR, N = 78). There were no significant differences in preoperative age, gender, etiology, main coronal curve or maximum kyphosis between TGR and MCGR groups. Patients with TGR had averaged 3.9 surgical lengthenings and MCGR had averaged 7.7 non-invasive lengthenings by the 2-year follow-up. When changes in preoperative to postoperative scores were compared, MCGR had more improvements in pain, emotion, child satisfaction and parent satisfaction than TGR although there were no statistical significance. When analyzed separately, MCGR cohort had improvement in scores for all four domains and four sub-domains; while, TGR cohort only had improvement in financial burden domain and pulmonary function sub-domain. Conclusion Although there was no statistical significance, the improvement in pain, emotion and satisfaction scores was larger in MCGR than TGR. Since these areas can be influenced more by mental well-being than other sub-domains, the results may prove our hypothesis that compared to TGR, MCGR with reduced number of surgeries have better psychosocial effects. Level of evidence III. Keywords Early-onset scoliosis · Magnetically controlled growing rods · Traditional growing rods · Health-related quality of life * David L. Skaggs [email protected] 1
Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
Children’s Orthopedic Center, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset Blvd., MS #69, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA
2
3
San Diego Spine Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA
4
Children’s Spin
Data Loading...