Comparing methods for predicting the impacts of invasive species
- PDF / 1,172,895 Bytes
- 15 Pages / 547.087 x 737.008 pts Page_size
- 20 Downloads / 237 Views
(0123456789().,-volV) ( 01234567 89().,-volV)
ORIGINAL PAPER
Comparing methods for predicting the impacts of invasive species Blaine D. Griffen . Danika van den Akker . Eleanor R. DiNuzzo . Lars Anderson . Ashley Vernier
Received: 14 March 2020 / Accepted: 26 September 2020 Ó Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
Abstract With the accelerating spread of invasive species around the globe, there is an urgent need to predict where invaders are likely to have the largest impacts and what those impacts will be. Predicting the impacts of individual invasive species a priori has proven to be a problematic endeavor, and several possible methods for doing this have been proposed. In this study we use a model system to compare the different predictive methods that have been proposed to determine which provides the most accurate predictions. Community composition in this system was measured at two separate sites in the Gulf of Maine 20 years ago, just before the arrival of the invasive Asian shore crab Hemigrapsus sanguineus. We repeated the community assessment at each site and determined the overall impacts of this invader over the last two decades. We then predicted the likely impacts based on the historical community composition using 3 methods: the invasion history of this species at sites further south along the mid-Atlantic, scaling up per capita consumption rates that have been measured on individual species in the recipient community, and using mesocosm experiments that used a range of experimental approaches. We show that the invader has had clear, but moderate impacts on
B. D. Griffen (&) D. van den Akker E. R. DiNuzzo L. Anderson A. Vernier Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84604, USA e-mail: [email protected]
the invaded sites since its arrival. We further show that for this omnivorous consumer, predictions based on invasion history and on long term field mesocosm experiments performed much better than predictions based on scaling up from consumption on individual species or based on short term mesocosm experiments conducted in the lab or field. These results highlight potential biases that can be produced by some mesocosm approaches and by scaling up from per capita consumption on individual prey species measured in isolation to predict consumer impacts under more natural conditions. Keywords Asian shore crab Community impacts Hemigrapsus sanguineus Invasion history Per capita impacts Scaling up
Introduction Invasive species are a ubiquitous part of most ecological systems due to continual anthropogenic spread, primarily associated with global shipping efforts (Seebens 2013). The number of newly documented invasions has risen continually over the last 200 years, accumulating slowly at first, but accelerating in an exponential fashion, reflecting an average of more than 1.5 new invasion records per day since 1800 (Seebens et al. 2017). It has been estimated that there are 10,000 species being transported around the globe
123
B. D. Griffen et al.
at any give
Data Loading...
