Comparison of inpatient distribution amongst different medical alliances in a county: a longitudinal study on a healthca

  • PDF / 673,052 Bytes
  • 9 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 79 Downloads / 151 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


(2020) 19:142

RESEARCH

Open Access

Comparison of inpatient distribution amongst different medical alliances in a county: a longitudinal study on a healthcare reform in rural China Yifan Ran1,2, Hongxia Gao1,2* , Dan Han1,2, Guilin Hou1,2, Yingchun Chen1,2 and Yan Zhang1,2

Abstract Background: China has launched the medical alliances (MAs) reform to drive the development of primary medical institutions and decrease health inequality in rural areas. Three different types of MAs were built to promote township hospitals in Y County. This study aims to evaluate the actual effect of China’s MAs reform in rural areas on inpatient distribution especially amongst different types of MAs. Methods: We obtain 2008–2015 claims data from the New Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) in Y County, Hubei Province of China. We consider January 2008–December 2010 as the pre-reform period and January 2011– December 2015 as the post-reform period. We use independent sample t-test and single-group interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) to compare the number of inpatients per month in the three MAs, including three county and 10 township hospitals before and after the reform. We use paired t-test and multiple-group ITSA between seven township hospitals within MAs and seven township hospitals outside MAs. Results: The MAs reform in Y County increased the number of inpatients in county and township hospitals within MAs. After the reform, the number of inpatients per month in county hospitals had an upward trend, with a slope of 31.01 person/month (P < 0.000). Approximately 19.99 new inpatients were admitted to township hospitals monthly after the reform (P < 0.000). Furthermore, township hospitals within MAs had a substantial increase in the number of inpatients (10.45 new inpatients monthly) compared with those outside MAs. Conclusion: The MAs reform in Y County significantly improved the capability of medical institutions within MAs. After the reform, township hospitals within MAs had greater development advantages than those outside MAs. However, it also caused further imbalance in the county region, which contained the new health inequality risk. Keywords: Medical alliances (MAs), Inpatient distribution, Interrupted time series analysis (ITSA), Rural health, Health inequality

* Correspondence: [email protected] 1 School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, Hubei, China 2 Research Centre for Rural Health Service, Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences of Hubei Provincial Department of Education, Wuhan 430030, Hubei, China © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party mat