Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts Reframing Partici
This book aims to identify ways of overcoming the limitations of the communicative tradition in understanding participatory spatial planning. Three conceptual models that offer different perspectives on public and civic participation in complex urban plan
- PDF / 1,952,267 Bytes
- 118 Pages / 439.37 x 666.142 pts Page_size
- 6 Downloads / 184 Views
Emanuela Saporito
Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts Reframing Participatory Spatial Planning 123
SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology PoliMI SpringerBriefs
Editorial Board Barbara Pernici, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy Stefano Della Torre, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy Bianca M. Colosimo, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy Tiziano Faravelli, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy Roberto Paolucci, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy Silvia Piardi, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/11159 http://www.polimi.it
Emanuela Saporito
Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts Reframing Participatory Spatial Planning
123
Emanuela Saporito Politecnico di Torino Turin Italy
ISSN 2191-530X SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences ISSN 2282-2577 PoliMI SpringerBriefs ISBN 978-3-319-30827-2 DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-30829-6
ISSN 2191-5318 and Technology ISSN 2282-2585
(electronic) (electronic)
ISBN 978-3-319-30829-6
(eBook)
Library of Congress Control Number: 2016940344 © The Author(s) 2016 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. Printed on acid-free paper This Springer imprint is published by Springer Nature The registered company is Springer International Publishing AG Switzerland
Preface
Building facts and machines is a collective process (…) a single person can create theses, dreams and sensations, but not facts. (Latour 1998, p. 53)
This book is the result of a theoretical inquiry into the nature of a discipline known as spatial planning. It is about, in particular, an opportunity to reframe ethics and norms for planners, in face of an ever more plural, complex and fragmented urban society. By drawing on different, but still complementary, cultural traditions of spatial planning theory—from critical theories to communicative ones—this work outlines how apparently contrasting conceptions of participation in planning practices can coexist, particula
Data Loading...
