Correction to: Impact of a combined multimodal-aerobic and multimodal intervention compared to standard aerobic treatmen
- PDF / 403,382 Bytes
- 2 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 5 Downloads / 172 Views
CORRECTION
Open Access
Correction to: Impact of a combined multimodal-aerobic and multimodal intervention compared to standard aerobic treatment in breast cancer survivors with chronic cancer-related fatigue - results of a three-armed pragmatic trial in a comprehensive cohort design Matthias Kröz1,2,3,4*, Marcus Reif5, Augustina Glinz2, Bettina Berger4, Andreas Nikolaou6, Roland Zerm1,2, Benno Brinkhaus3, Matthias Girke1,2, Arndt Büssing4, Christoph Gutenbrunner6 and On behalf of the CRF-2 study group Correction to: BMC Cancer 17, 166 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3142-7 Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported the following errors: 1) In Fig. 3 the y-axis is incorrectly labeled as ‘Mean (SD)’ instead of ‘Mean (standard error)’, since Fig. 3 in fact shows estimates of mean and standard error of the mean. Figure 3 has been corrected in this correction article. The authors have taken the opportunity to include an editing change by denoting the combination therapy arm as ‘CT’ instead of ‘KT’. 2) There are some discrepancies in the first paragraph of the ‘Study-group characteristics’ section caused by a mix-up of ITT analyses with analyses based on the full set of initially included patients. In fact, the mean age values range from 56.6 to 60.3 instead of 56.4 to 58.8 years (as correctly shown The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885017-3142-7. * Correspondence: [email protected] 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Havelhöhe Hospital, Kladower Damm 221, D-14089 Berlin, Germany 2 Research Institute Havelhöhe, Kladower Damm 221, D-14089 Berlin, Germany Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
in Table 2); and the p-values indicating significant group differences of height, rehabilitation, and other disorders are 0.0325, 0.0312, and 0.0369 instead of 0.0168, 0.027, and 0.0313, respectively. None of these changes impair the study outcome or its interpretation in any way. Author details 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Havelhöhe Hospital, Kladower Damm 221, D-14089 Berlin, Germany. 2Research Institute Havelhöhe, Kladower Damm 221, D-14089 Berlin, Germany. 3Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité CCM, 10098 Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 4nstitute for Integrative Medicine, University of Witten/Herdecke, Gerhard-Kienle-Weg, 58313 Herdecke, Germany. 5Society for Clinical Research, Hardenbergstraße 20, 10623 Berlin, Germany. 6Clinic for Rehabilitative Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Reference 1. Kröz M, Reif M, Glinz A, et al. Impact of a combined multimodal-aerobic and multimodal intervention compared to standard aerobic treatment in breast cancer survivors with chronic cancer-related fatigue - results of a threearmed pragmatic trial in a comprehensive cohort design. BMC Cancer. 2017; 17:166. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3142-7.
© The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a
Data Loading...
