Correction to: Integrated Extremal Control and Explicit Guidance for Quadcopters

  • PDF / 241,660 Bytes
  • 1 Pages / 595.224 x 790.955 pts Page_size
  • 58 Downloads / 242 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


CORRECTION

Correction to: Integrated Extremal Control and Explicit Guidance for Quadcopters Evan Kawamura1

· Dilmurat Azimov1

© Springer Nature B.V. 2020

Erratum to: Journal of Intelligent Robotics System https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-020-01211-2

References 1. Kawamura, E., Azimov, D.: Integrated extremal control and explicit guidance for quadcopters. J Intell Robotic Sys, 1–31 (2020)

Fig. 17 Waypoint Guidance: E Guidance & PID Velocity Comparison vs. Time

vN,EG, vE,EG , vU,EG (m/s)

Due to oversight, an incorrect figure in Ref. [1] was printed for Fig. 17, but the original wording and description of Fig. 17 is correct. The correct Fig. 17 is below.

Waypoint Guidance: E Guidance Velocity (NEU) vs. Time

10

v N,EG v E,EG

5

v U,EG

0

-5 0

v N,PID , vE,PID , vU,PID (m/s)

Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

5

10

15

25

4 v N,PID v E,PID

2

v U,PID

0 -2 -4 0

5

10

15

Time (seconds) The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-020-01211-2.  Evan Kawamura

[email protected] Dilmurat Azimov [email protected] 1

20

Time (seconds) Waypoint Guidance: PID Velocity (NEU) vs. Time

Mechanical Engineering, University of Hawaii: Manoa, Holmes Hall, 2540 Dole Street, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA

20

25