Correction to: Preliminary evaluation of the Vision PERformance (VIPER) simulator
- PDF / 236,711 Bytes
- 2 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 118 Downloads / 205 Views
CORRECTION
Open Access
Correction to: Preliminary evaluation of the Vision PERformance (VIPER) simulator Denise S. Ryan1*, Rose K. Sia1, Jennifer B. Eaddy1, Lorie A. Logan1, Jide O. Familoni2, Hind Beydoun3, Samantha B. Rodgers1 and Bruce A. Rivers1 Correction to: Military Med Res 7, 2 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-0231-8 Correction Following publication of the original article [1], the editor identified the Tables 5 and 6 are incorrect. The correct Tables 5 and 6 are as below. Author details 1 Warfighter Refractive Eye Surgery Program and Research Center, Fort Belvoir Community Hospital, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060, USA. 2Night Vision and Electronic Sensors Directorate, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060, USA. 3Department of Research Programs, Fort Belvoir Community Hospital, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060, USA.
Reference 1. Ryan DS, et al. Preliminary evaluation of the Vision PERformance (VIPER) simulator. Military Med Res. 2020;7:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-0231-8.
The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779020-0231-8. * Correspondence: [email protected] 1 Warfighter Refractive Eye Surgery Program and Research Center, Fort Belvoir Community Hospital, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060, USA Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Ryan et al. Military Medical Research
(2020) 7:50
Page 2 of 2
Table 5 Simple (unadjusted) and multiple (adjusted) stepwise regression models for best corrected distance visual acuity logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), best corrected distance visual acuity manifest spherical equivalent (MSE), 25% mesopic contrast, super vision test LogMAR and logarithm of the contrast sensitivity (logCS), and total higher order aberrations (HOA) as predictors of average detection distance of IEDs (n = 29) Item Best CDVA LogMAR
Adjusteda
Unadjusted β
SE
P
R
β
SE
P
3.73
25.00
0.882
0.001
–
–
–
2
Best CDVA MSE
1.91
0.81
0.025
0.166
1.58
0.
Data Loading...
