Correction to: The Effectiveness of Resisted Sled Training (RST) for Sprint Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-an
- PDF / 672,303 Bytes
- 2 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 7 Downloads / 195 Views
CORRECTION
Correction to: The Effectiveness of Resisted Sled Training (RST) for Sprint Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta‑analysis Pedro E. Alcaraz1,2 · Jorge Carlos‑Vivas1 · Bruno O. Oponjuru1 · Alejandro Martínez‑Rodríguez3
© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018
Correction to: Sports Medicine https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0947-8
Page 1: Abstract, Conclusions, sentence 4. The following sentence, which read: Moreover, the intensity (load) is not a determinant of sprint performance improvement, but the recommended volume is > 160 m per session, and approximately 2680 m per week, with a training frequency of two to three times per week, for at least 6 weeks. should read: Moreover, the intensity (load) is not a determinant of sprint performance improvement, but the recommended volume is > 160 m per session, and approximately 2680 m per total training program, with a training frequency of two to three times per week, for at least 6 weeks. Page 6: Section 3.3, paragraph 3, sentence 2. The following sentence, which read:
The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1007/ s40279-018-0947-8. * Pedro E. Alcaraz [email protected] * Alejandro Martínez‑Rodríguez [email protected] 1
UCAM Research Center for High Performance Sport, Catholic University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
2
Faculty of Sport Sciences, UCAM, Catholic University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
3
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Nutrition and Food Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain
A large ES was obtained for a frequency over twice a week (ES 1.85) [55], and moderate ESs were found for lower loads (ES 0.61) [39, 55–57, 59–65], > 6-week training periods (ES 0.63) [39, 55, 56, 60, 63–66], session volume > 160 m (ES 0.92) [55, 56, 59, 60, 64], total weekly training volume > 2680 m (ES 0.83) [55, 59, 60, 64], and rigid surface (ES 0.69) [39, 56, 61, 64]. should read: A large ES was obtained for a frequency over twice a week (ES 1.85) [55], and moderate ESs were found for lower loads (ES 0.61) [39, 55–57, 59–65], > 6-week training periods (ES 0.63) [39, 55, 56, 60, 63–66], session volume > 160 m (ES 0.92) [55, 56, 59, 60, 64], total training volume > 2680 m (ES 0.83) [55, 59, 60, 64], and rigid surface (ES 0.69) [39, 56, 61, 64]. Page 6: Section 3.3, paragraph 3, sentence 3. The following sentence, which read: Small ESs were also found for a training frequency equal to or fewer than two trainings per week (ES 0.52) [39, 56, 57, 59–66], a total weekly training volume 160 m (ES 0.53; p = 0.03), and weekly values > 2680 m (ES 0.53; p = 0.03).
should read:
should read:
Another variable that should be considered when designing training programs with RST is volume, both for each session and for the training cycle (i.e. mesocycle).
With respect to the training characteristics, the effect was small in all cases and significant with loads 6 weeks (ES 0.39; p = 0.01), volumes per session > 160 m (ES 0.53; p = 0.03), and total training val
Data Loading...
