Increases in Lower-Body Strength Transfer Positively to Sprint Performance: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

  • PDF / 309,142 Bytes
  • 10 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 64 Downloads / 210 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Increases in Lower-Body Strength Transfer Positively to Sprint Performance: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis Laurent B. Seitz • Alvaro Reyes • Tai T. Tran • Eduardo Saez de Villarreal • G. Gregory Haff

Published online: 25 July 2014 Ó Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Abstract Background Although lower-body strength is correlated with sprint performance, whether increases in lower-body strength transfer positively to sprint performance remain unclear. Objectives This meta-analysis determined whether increases in lower-body strength (measured with the freeweight back squat exercise) transfer positively to sprint performance, and identified the effects of various subject characteristics and resistance-training variables on the magnitude of sprint improvement.

L. B. Seitz (&)  G. G. Haff Centre for Exercise and Sports Sciences Research (CESSR), School of Exercise and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia e-mail: [email protected] A. Reyes School of Medical Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia T. T. Tran Hurley Surfing Australia High Performance Centre, Casuarina Beach, NSW, Australia E. S. de Villarreal Laboratory of Human Performance, Faculty of Sport, University Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain

Methods A computerized search was conducted in ADONIS, ERIC, SPORTDiscus, EBSCOhost, Google Scholar, MEDLINE and PubMed databases, and references of original studies and reviews were searched for further relevant studies. The analysis comprised 510 subjects and 85 effect sizes (ESs), nested with 26 experimental and 11 control groups and 15 studies. Results There is a transfer between increases in lowerbody strength and sprint performance as indicated by a very large significant correlation (r = -0.77; p = 0.0001) between squat strength ES and sprint ES. Additionally, the magnitude of sprint improvement is affected by the level of practice (p = 0.03) and body mass (r = 0.35; p = 0.011) of the subject, the frequency of resistance-training sessions per week (r = 0.50; p = 0.001) and the rest interval between sets of resistance-training exercises (r = -0.47; p B 0.001). Conversely, the magnitude of sprint improvement is not affected by the athlete’s age (p = 0.86) and height (p = 0.08), the resistance-training methods used through the training intervention, (p = 0.06), average load intensity [% of 1 repetition maximum (RM)] used during the resistance-training sessions (p = 0.34), training program duration (p = 0.16), number of exercises per session (p = 0.16), number of sets per exercise (p = 0.06) and number of repetitions per set (p = 0.48). Conclusions Increases in lower-body strength transfer positively to sprint performance. The magnitude of sprint improvement is affected by numerous subject characteristics and resistance-training variables, but the large difference in number of ESs available should be taken into consideration. Overall, the reported improvement in sprint performance (sprint ES = -0.87, me