Correction to: Water quality evaluation of two urban streams in Northwest Uruguay: are national regulations for urban st
- PDF / 155,932 Bytes
- 1 Pages / 547.087 x 737.008 pts Page_size
- 97 Downloads / 192 Views
CORRECTION
Correction to: Water quality evaluation of two urban streams in Northwest Uruguay: are national regulations for urban stream quality sufficient? Elena Alvareda & Christine Lucas & Mercedes Paradiso & Adriana Piperno & Pablo Gamazo & Vanessa Erasun & Paola Russo & Andres Saracho & Rafael Banega & Gonzalo Sapriza & Franco Teixeira de Mello
# Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
Correction to: Environ Monit Assess (2020) 192:661 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08614-6 The original version of this article unfortunately contained an error in the published paper.
The paragraph (in page 17): "Recently, TP standards in the main channel of the Uruguay River were raised from 0.025 to 100 mg/L in association with the consistently high levels of phosphorous registered over time (CARU 2019)". It should be:
The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08614-6 E. Alvareda (*) : C. Lucas : P. Gamazo : V. Erasun : P. Russo : A. Saracho : R. Banega : G. Sapriza Departamento del Agua, Universidad de la República, University Center of Salto, 1350 Salto, Rivera, Uruguay e-mail: [email protected] C. Lucas Polo de Ecología Fluvial, Universidad de la República, University Center of Paysandu, Paysandu, Uruguay M. Paradiso Unidad de Gestión Ambiental, Paysandu Municipal Government, Sarandí esq. Zorrilla de San Martín., 60000 Paysandú, Uruguay A. Piperno Facultad de Arquitectura Diseño y Urbanismo, Universidad de la República, Br. Artigas, 1031 Montevideo, Uruguay F. T. de Mello Departmento de Ecología y Gestión Ambiental, Universidad de la República, CURE Tacuarembó, 20100 Maldonado, Uruguay e-mail: [email protected]
“Recently guideline values for TP in the main channel of Uruguay River were implemented suggesting a maximum standard level of 0.100 mg/l (CARU, actual guidelines) which is considerably higher to the Uruguayan regulation of 0.025 mg/l for the National watercourses in Uruguay“
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Data Loading...
