CT in the prediction of margin-negative resection in pancreatic cancer following neoadjuvant treatment: a systematic rev
- PDF / 483,253 Bytes
- 11 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 46 Downloads / 186 Views
HEPATOBILIARY-PANCREAS
CT in the prediction of margin-negative resection in pancreatic cancer following neoadjuvant treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis Sohee Park 1 & Jong Keon Jang 1 & Jae Ho Byun 1 & Jin Hee Kim 1 & Seung Soo Lee 1 & Hyoung Jung Kim 1 & Seung Baek Hong 2 & Seong Ho Park 1 Received: 11 June 2020 / Revised: 8 October 2020 / Accepted: 15 October 2020 # European Society of Radiology 2020
Abstract Objectives We aimed to systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CT-determined resectability following neoadjuvant treatment for predicting margin-negative resection (R0 resection) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods Original studies with sufficient details to obtain the sensitivity and specificity of CT-determined resectability following neoadjuvant treatment, with a reference on the pathological margin status, were identified in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases until February 24, 2020. The identified studies were divided into two groups based on the criteria of R0 resectable tumor (ordinary criterion: resectable PDAC alone; extended criterion: resectable and borderline resectable PDAC). The metaanalytic summary of the sensitivity and specificity for each criterion was estimated separately using a bivariate random-effect model. Summary results of the two criteria were compared using a joint-model bivariate meta-regression. Results Of 739 studies initially searched, 6 studies (6 with ordinary criterion and 5 with extended criterion) were included for analysis. The meta-analytic summary of sensitivity and specificity was 45% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19–73%; I2 = 88.3%) and 85% (95% CI, 65–94%; I2 = 60.5%) for the ordinary criterion, and 81% (95% CI, 71–87%; I2 = 0.0%) and 42% (95% CI, 28–57%; I2 = 6.2%) for the extended criterion, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy significantly differed between the two criteria (p = 0.02). Conclusions For determining resectability on CT, the ordinary criterion might be highly specific but insensitive for predicting R0 resection, whereas the extended criterion increased sensitivity but would decrease specificity. Further investigations using quantitative parameters may improve the identification of R0 resection. Key Points • CT-determined resectability of PDAC after neoadjuvant treatment using the ordinary criterion shows low sensitivity and high specificity in predicting R0 resection. • With the extended criterion, CT-determined resectability shows higher sensitivity but lower specificity than with the ordinary criterion. • CT-determined resectability with both criteria achieved suboptimal diagnostic performances, suggesting that care should be taken while selecting surgical candidates and when determining the surgical extent after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with PDAC. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07433-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. * Jong Keon Jang [email protected] 1
Depa
Data Loading...
