Do beds of subtidal estuarine seagrass constitute a refuge for macrobenthic biodiversity threatened intertidally?
- PDF / 1,562,015 Bytes
- 18 Pages / 439.37 x 666.142 pts Page_size
- 6 Downloads / 153 Views
(0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,-volV)
ORIGINAL PAPER
Do beds of subtidal estuarine seagrass constitute a refuge for macrobenthic biodiversity threatened intertidally? R. S. K. Barnes1,2,3
•
L. Claassens1,2,4
Received: 18 March 2020 / Revised: 25 June 2020 / Accepted: 19 July 2020 Ó The Author(s) 2020
Abstract Biodiversity differentials between macrobenthic assemblages associated with adjacent intertidal and subtidal areas of a single seagrass system were investigated for the first time. Assemblage metrics of conservation relevance—faunal abundance and its patchiness, faunal richness, and beta diversity—were examined at four contrasting dwarf-eelgrass localities in the Knysna estuarine bay, part of South Africa’s Garden Route National Park but a system whose intertidal areas are heavily impacted anthropogenically. Faunal assemblages were significantly different across all localities and between subtidal and intertidal levels at each locality although their taxonomic distinctness was effectively constant. Although, as would be expected, there were clear trends for increases in overall numbers of species towards the mouth at all levels, few generalities relating to the relative importance of the subtidal seagrass habitat were evident across the whole system—magnitude and direction of differentials were contingent on locality. Shore-height related differences in assemblage metrics were minor in the estuarine and lagoonal zones but major in the marine compartment, although the much greater subtidal faunal abundance there was largely consequent on the superabundance of a single species (the microgastropod Alaba pinnae), intertidal zones then displaying the greater species diversity due to greater equitability of species densities. Along its axial channel, the Knysna subtidal seagrass does not support richer versions of the intertidal polychaete-dominated assemblages fringing it; instead, it supports different and more patchily dispersed gastropoddominated ones. At Knysna at least, the subtidal hardly constitutes a reservoir of the seagrass biodiversity present intertidally. Keywords Alaba Bait-harvesting Eelgrass Knysna Patchiness Macrofauna Soft sediments Smaragdia Zostera capensis
Communicated by Angus Jackson. This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Coastal and marine biodiversity. & R. S. K. Barnes [email protected] Extended author information available on the last page of the article
123
Biodiversity and Conservation
Introduction Seagrass is markedly under-appreciated, for example receiving \ 1.5% of the total media attention devoted to coastal systems, compared to coral reef’s 72.5% (Duarte et al. 2008; Dennison 2009; van Keulen et al. 2018). Yet it plays one of the planet’s most important ecosystem-service roles (Costanza et al. 2014). Although assessment of all the services provided by seagrass beds is still incomplete (Barbier et al. 2011; Nordlund et al. 2018), not least because they vary from region to region and from species to species (Nordlund et al. 2016), they have
Data Loading...
