Does implementation of the PECARN rules for minor head trauma improve patient-centered outcomes in a lower resource emer
- PDF / 916,334 Bytes
- 11 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 19 Downloads / 147 Views
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Open Access
Does implementation of the PECARN rules for minor head trauma improve patientcentered outcomes in a lower resource emergency department: a retrospective cohort study Rasha D. Sawaya1, Cynthia Wakil1, Adonis Wazir1, Sami Shayya1, Iskandar Berbari1, Rawan Safa1, Maha Makki1, Mahdi Hamade2 and Hani Tamim3,4*
Abstract Background: Managing children with minor head trauma remains challenging for physicians who evaluate for the need for computed tomography (CT) imaging for clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI) identification. The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) prediction rules were adopted in our pediatric emergency department (PED) in December 2013 to identify children at low risk for ciTBI. This study aimed to evaluate this implementation’s impact on CT rates and clinical outcomes. Methods: Retrospective cohort study on pediatric patients with head trauma presenting to the PED of the American University of Beirut Medical Center in Lebanon. Participants were divided into pre- (December 2012 to December 2013) and post-PECARN (January 2014 to December 2016) groups. Patients were further divided into < 2 and ≥ 2 years and stratified into groups of low, intermediate and high risk for ciTBI. Bivariate analysis was conducted to determine differences between both groups. Results: We included 1362 children of which 425 (31.2%) presented pre- and 937 (68.8%) presented post-PECARN rules implementation with 1090 (80.0%) of low, 214 (15.7%) of intermediate and 58 (4.3%) of high risk for ciTBI. CTs were ordered on 92 (21.6%) pre- versus 174 (18.6%) patients post-PECARN (p = 0.18). Among patients < 2 years, CT rates significantly decreased from 25.2% (34/135) to 16.5% (51/309) post-PECARN (p = 0.03), and dropped in all risk groups but only significantly for low risk patients from 20.7% (24/116) to 11.4% (30/264) (p = 0.02). There was no significant decrease in CT rates in patients ≥2 years (20% pre (58/290) vs 19.6% post (123/628), p = 0.88). There was no increase in bounce back numbers, nor in admission rates or positive CT findings among bounce backs. (Continued on next page)
* Correspondence: [email protected]; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Medicine, Clinical Research Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon 4 Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the a
Data Loading...
