Early life ionizing radiation exposure and cancer risks: systematic review and meta-analysis

  • PDF / 607,248 Bytes
  • 12 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 15 Downloads / 198 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Early life ionizing radiation exposure and cancer risks: systematic review and meta-analysis Kossi D. Abalo 1 & Estelle Rage 1 & Klervi Leuraud 1 & David B. Richardson 2 & Hubert Ducou Le Pointe 3 & Dominique Laurier 4 & Marie-Odile Bernier 1 Received: 23 January 2020 / Revised: 12 June 2020 / Accepted: 5 August 2020 # Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Abstract Background Ionizing radiation use for medical diagnostic purposes has substantially increased over the last three decades. Moderate to high doses of radiation are well established causes of cancer, especially for exposure at young ages. However, cancer risk from low-dose medical imaging is debated. Objective To review the literature on cancer risks associated with prenatal and postnatal medical diagnostic ionizing radiation exposure among children and to assess this risk through a meta-analysis. Materials and methods A literature search of five electronic databases supplemented by a hand search was performed to retrieve relevant epidemiological studies published from 2000 to 2019, including patients younger than 22 years of age exposed to medical imaging ionizing radiation. Pooled odds ratio (ORpooled) and pooled excess relative risk (ERRpooled) representing the excess of risk per unit of organ dose were estimated with a random effect model. Results Twenty-four studies were included. For prenatal exposure (radiographs or CT), no significant increased risk was reported for all cancers, leukemia and brain tumors. For postnatal exposure, increased risk was observed only for CT, mostly for leukemia (ERRpooled=26.9 Gy−1; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.7–57.1) and brain tumors (ERRpooled=9.1 Gy−1; 95% CI: 5.2–13.1). Conclusion CT exposure in childhood appears to be associated with increased risk of cancer while no significant association was observed with diagnostic radiographs. Keywords Cancer . Children . Computed tomography . Ionizing radiation . Postnatal . Prenatal . Radiography . Risk

Introduction Medical diagnostic imaging using ionizing radiation is a very important tool in patients’ care and substantial benefits arise from its use. Recent decades have been marked by an increased use of medical radiation imaging [1] representing an annual growth of about 5% to 8% per capita [2], mostly in developed countries. * Kossi D. Abalo [email protected] 1

Laboratory of Epidemiology, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, BP 17, 92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France

2

Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

3

Department of Pediatric Imaging, Hôpital d’Enfants Armand-Trousseau APHP, Paris, France

4

Research Department on Biological and Health Effects of Ionizing Radiation, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France

Although single doses delivered per examination have decreased over the years, thanks to advances in technologies, protocol improvements, awareness and the reactivity of radiologists

Data Loading...