Effectiveness and postoperative pain level of single-port versus two-port thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer: a ret

  • PDF / 560,347 Bytes
  • 8 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 24 Downloads / 165 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Effectiveness and postoperative pain level of single‑port versus two‑port thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study Cheng‑guang Hu1 · Kang Zheng1 · Guan‑hua Liu1 · Zhi‑long Li1 · Yan‑li Zhao1 · Jian‑hong Lian1 · Shi‑ping Guo1 Received: 22 April 2020 / Accepted: 29 August 2020 © The Author(s) 2020

Abstract Objectives  Single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy is a new therapeutic technique for patients with lung cancer; however, insufficient data are available regarding its clinical outcomes. We therefore compared the clinical outcomes of single-port and two-port thoracoscopic lobectomies for lung cancer. Methods  We retrospectively analyzed and compared the data of 204 and 368 patients with lung cancer who underwent single-port or two-port thoracoscopic lobectomy, respectively, between October 2014 and October 2017 at our institution. Patients in both groups underwent 1:1 propensity score matching, and 400 patients (200 patients in each group) were included. Perioperative clinical indicators were analyzed, including operation time, lymph node dissection stations and numbers, incidence of postoperative complications, and pain scores at 24 h, 72 h, and 1 week after surgery. Results  No perioperative deaths occurred in either group. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, chest drainage duration, duration of postoperative hospital stay, lymph node dissection station and number, rate of conversion to open surgery, number of ruptured intraoperative pulmonary vessel, and incidence of postoperative complications were not significantly different between the groups (all P > 0.05). However, analysis of the 24-h (P = 0.005), 72-h (P = 0.011), and 1-week (P = 0.034) visual analog scale score after surgery revealed that the postoperative pain levels were significantly lower in the single-port than in the two-port group. Conclusions  Single-port and two-port thoracoscopic lobectomies had similar perioperative outcomes, although the postoperative pain was lower after single-port than two-port thoracoscopic lobectomy. Hence, we concluded that single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy is an effective, minimally invasive, and promising surgical procedure. Keywords  Lung cancer · Video-assisted thoracic surgery · Single port · Lobectomy

Introduction Lung cancer is a serious malignant disease, with the highest mortality rate of all the malignant diseases [1]. Resection (most commonly lobectomy) is one of the main treatment modalities for lung cancer. Thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer was first performed in the 1990s [2]; furthermore, it is widely favored by thoracic surgeons and patients, as it involves minimal invasiveness, rapid recovery, and * Cheng‑guang Hu [email protected] 1



Department of Thoracic Surgery, ShanXi Cancer Hospital, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, No. 3 Kaixuan Street, Xinghualing District, Taiyuan 030013, China

maintenance of cosmetic features. Moreover, as surgical technology and instrument have improved over time, the number of por