Induction chemotherapy for the individualised treatment of hypopharyngeal carcinoma with cervical oesophageal invasion:

  • PDF / 828,708 Bytes
  • 7 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 81 Downloads / 164 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


(2020) 18:330

RESEARCH

Open Access

Induction chemotherapy for the individualised treatment of hypopharyngeal carcinoma with cervical oesophageal invasion: a retrospective cohort study Tian-Qiao Huang, Ru Wang, Ju-Gao Fang* , Shi-Zhi He*, Qi Zhong, Li-Zhen Hou, Hong-Zhi Ma, Xiao-Hong Chen, Xue-Jun Chen, Ping-Dong Li, Ling Feng, Qian Shi and Meng Lian

Abstract Background: This study aimed to evaluate the potential of induction chemotherapy as an indicator of the management of advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma with cervical oesophageal invasion. Methods: Sixty-eight patients admitted to our hospital between February 2003 and November 2016 with stage IVB hypopharyngeal carcinoma with cervical oesophageal invasion were retrospectively analysed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment they selected following an explanation of the different treatments available. Patients in group A received induction chemotherapy and had (1) complete/partial remission following chemotherapy and radiotherapy/concurrent chemoradiotherapy or (2) stable disease following chemotherapy and surgery. Patients in group B underwent surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy/concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and differences between the groups were evaluated using the log-rank test. Laryngeal and oesophageal retention rates were compared using the crosstabulation test. Results: The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 22.86% and 11.43% in group A and 24.25% and 6.06% in group B, respectively (all P > 0.05). The laryngeal and oesophageal retention rates were 40.0% and 74.3% in group A and 0.0% and 27.3% in group B, respectively (all P < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of post-operative complications between the two groups (group A 8.6%, group B 12.1%; P > 0.05). Conclusions: Induction chemotherapy may be an appropriate first choice to ensure laryngeal and oesophageal preservation in the individualised treatment of advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma with cervical oesophageal invasion. Keywords: Hypopharyngeal carcinoma, Induction chemotherapy, Oesophageal invasion, Overall survival, Personalised medicine

* Correspondence: [email protected]; [email protected] Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, affiliated with Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and