Irradiation stent insertion for inoperable malignant biliary obstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
- PDF / 2,260,733 Bytes
- 9 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 108 Downloads / 198 Views
REVIEW
Irradiation stent insertion for inoperable malignant biliary obstruction: a meta‑analysis of randomized controlled trials Kai‑Hui Sha1 · Tong‑Gang Liu2 · Fang Yang2 · Li‑Guo Zhang2 · Zi‑Shan Jiao1 · Feng‑Fei Xia3 Received: 26 August 2020 / Revised: 21 October 2020 / Accepted: 30 October 2020 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020
Abstract The purpose of the study was to compare the relative clinical efficacies of irradiation stent (IRS) and conventional stent (CVS) insertions for the treatment of patients with malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the date of inception through to August 2020. Data analysis was performed using RevMan v5.3. This meta-analysis included eight RCTs which included a total of 319 patients who had undergone IRS insertion, and 328 who had undergone CVS insertion. No significant differences in pooled Δ total bilirubin values (MD 0.34; P = 0.92), incident rates of cholangitis (P = 0.47), hemobilia (P = 0.60), or pancreatitis (P = 0.89) were detected between two groups. The rate of stent dysfunction was significantly lower in the IRS group compared to the CVS group (22.2% vs. 37.7%, P = 0.02). The pooled stent patency (P < 0.00001) and survival (P < 0.00001) were significantly longer in the IRS group compared to the CVS group. Significant heterogeneity was detected in the endpoints of rate of stent dysfunction (I2 = 52%; P = 0.08) and survival (I2 = 77%; P = 0.0005). Subgroup analysis was performed based on the different IRS types and showed significantly longer survival in the IRS group based on both types of IRS. Funnel plot analyses did not detect any evidence of publication bias. This meta-analysis included eight RCTs which included a total of 319 patients who had undergone IRS insertion, and 328 who had undergone CVS insertion. No significant differences in pooled Δ total bilirubin values (MD 0.34; P = 0.92), incident rates of cholangitis (P = 0.47), hemobilia (P = 0.60), or pancreatitis (P = 0.89) were detected between 2 groups. The rate of stent dysfunction was significantly lower in the IRS group compared to the CVS group (22.2% vs. 37.7%, P = 0.02). The pooled stent patency (P < 0.00001) and survival (P < 0.00001) were significantly longer in the IRS group compared to the CVS group. Significant heterogeneity was detected in the endpoints of rate of stent dysfunction (I2 = 52%; P = 0.08) and survival (I2 = 77%; P = 0.0005). Subgroup analysis was performed based on the different IRS types and showed significantly longer survival in the IRS group based on both types of IRS. Funnel plot analyses did not detect any evidence of publication bias. Our meta-analysis demonstrates that IRS insertion can prolong stent patency and the survival of patients with MBO compared to CVS insertion. Keywords Stent · Irradiation · Malignant biliary cancer · Meta-analysis
Introduction
* Kai‑Hui Sha [email protected] 1
School of Nursing, Binzhou Medi
Data Loading...
