Measuring Racial Disparities in Police Use of Force: Methods Matter

  • PDF / 1,082,250 Bytes
  • 31 Pages / 439.37 x 666.142 pts Page_size
  • 25 Downloads / 195 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


Measuring Racial Disparities in Police Use of Force: Methods Matter Amanda Geller1   · Phillip Atiba Goff2 · Tracey Lloyd2 · Amelia Haviland3 · Dean Obermark4 · Jack Glaser5

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Abstract Objectives  To understand the impact of measurement and analytic choices on assessments of police use of force (UOF) and racial disparities therein. Methods We collected and standardized UOF data (N = 9982 incidents) from a diverse set of 11 police departments, and measured departments’ aggregate force severity in five ways. We assessed the sensitivity of racial disparities in UOF severity to a series of analytic choices, using a 5 × 2 × 2 × 2 design comparing force severity to population and arrest benchmarks, using two definitions of minority group (Black/Nonwhite), and two modes of comparison (ratios/differences). Results  Significant racial disparities were observed under most analytic choices in most departments. However, lethal force was rare, and estimates of lethal force disparities were statistically uncertain, as were departments’ relative ranks as equitable or disparate. Ratios of minority to White force severity were less sensitive to measurement differences within measures including nonlethal force. The choice of a population or arrest benchmark had implications for which departments emerged as highly disparate, while focal minority group and mode of comparison had less systematic effects. Conclusions  Given increased scrutiny of police activity by advocates and policymakers, it is important to understand how measurement and other analytic choices affect our understanding of equity in police practices. Our findings demonstrate that analytical decisions interact in complex ways and that standardization is essential when comparing multiple departments. We recommend comprehensive data collection that includes nonlethal as well as lethal force, and make recommendations for measuring and contextualizing racial disparities in UOF and other police activity. Keywords  Policing · Racial disparities · Use of force · Measurement · Benchmarking

Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (https​://doi.org/10.1007/s1094​ 0-020-09471​-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. * Amanda Geller [email protected] Extended author information available on the last page of the article

13

Vol.:(0123456789)



Journal of Quantitative Criminology

Introduction The police are widely recognized as both a key input into public safety (Weisburd and Majmandur 2018), and a potential driver or mitigant of social inequality at a population level (Shedd 2015; Geller 2020), with significant implications for the wellbeing of individuals and communities. Perhaps the most distinguishing feature of police in society, however, is their authority to use physical force, even injurious or lethal force, against civilians. It is critical to understand how police exercise this authority (Weitzer 2017). Racial disparities in police