Meta-Philosophical Reflection on Feminist Philosophies of Science
This volume offers a meta-philosophical reflection on feminist philosophies of science. It emphasizes and discusses both the connections and differences between "traditional" philosophies of science and feminist philosophies of science. The collection sys
- PDF / 2,483,538 Bytes
- 225 Pages / 453.543 x 683.15 pts Page_size
- 102 Downloads / 191 Views
Maria Cristina Amoretti Nicla Vassallo Editors
Meta-Philosophical Reflection on Feminist Philosophies of Science
Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science Volume 317
Editor ALISA BOKULICH, Boston University ROBERT S. COHEN, Boston University JÜRGEN RENN, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science KOSTAS GAVROGLU, University of Athens Managing Editor LINDY DIVARCI, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Editorial Board THEODORE ARABATZIS, University of Athens HEATHER E. DOUGLAS, University of Waterloo JEAN GAYON, Université Paris 1 THOMAS F. GLICK, Boston University HUBERT GOENNER, University of Goettingen JOHN HEILBRON, University of California, Berkeley DIANA KORMOS-BUCHWALD, California Institute of Technology CHRISTOPH LEHNER, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science PETER MCLAUGHLIN, Universität Heidelberg AGUSTÍ NIETO-GALAN, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona NUCCIO ORDINE, Universitá della Calabria ANA SIMÕES, Universidade de Lisboa JOHN J. STACHEL, Boston University SYLVAN S. SCHWEBER, Harvard University BAICHUN ZHANG, Chinese Academy of Science
The series Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science was conceived in the broadest framework of interdisciplinary and international concerns. Natural scientists, mathematicians, social scientists and philosophers have contributed to the series, as have historians and sociologists of science, linguists, psychologists, physicians, and literary critics. The series has been able to include works by authors from many other countries around the world. The editors believe that the history and philosophy of science should itself be scientific, self-consciously critical, humane as well as rational, sceptical and undogmatic while also receptive to discussion of first principles. One of the aims of Boston Studies, therefore, is to develop collaboration among scientists, historians and philosophers. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science looks into and reflects on interactions between epistemological and historical dimensions in an effort to understand the scientific enterprise from every viewpoint.
More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/5710
Maria Cristina Amoretti Nicla Vassallo •
Editors
Meta-Philosophical Reflection on Feminist Philosophies of Science
123
Editors Maria Cristina Amoretti Department of Classics, Philosophy, and History University of Genoa Genova Italy
Nicla Vassallo Department of Classics, Philosophy, and History University of Genoa Genova Italy
ISSN 0068-0346 ISSN 2214-7942 (electronic) Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science ISBN 978-3-319-26346-5 ISBN 978-3-319-26348-9 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26348-9 Library of Congress Control Number: 2015954611 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, r
Data Loading...
