Occupational risk of exposure to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and the quality of infection hygiene

  • PDF / 451,921 Bytes
  • 11 Pages / 595.276 x 785.197 pts Page_size
  • 49 Downloads / 232 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


RESEARCH ARTICLE

Occupational risk of exposure to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and the quality of infection hygiene in nursing homes Pil Uthaug Rasmussen (✉)1, Katrine Uhrbrand1, Mette Damkjær Bartels2, Helle Neustrup2, Dorina Gabriela Karottki1,3, Ute Bültmann1,4, Anne Mette Madsen1 1 National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark 2 Department of Clinical Microbiology, Hvidovre Hospital, Kettegård Allé 30, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark 3 The Danish Working Environment Authority, Landskronagade 33, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark 4 University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Health Sciences, Community & Occupational Medicine, University of Groningen, 9700 Groningen, The Netherlands*

HIGHLIGHTS

GRAPHIC ABSTRACT

• Staff members were not colonised with MRSA. • But staff were exposed to MRSA from air, sedimented dust and surfaces. • MRSA was found in the rooms of MRSAcolonised residents but not in common areas. • Staff worry about MRSA and spreading it to other residents, family, and acquaintances. • The use of protective eyewear and facemasks could be improved.

ARTICLE INFO

ABSTRACT

Article history:

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an increasing health concern across the globe and is often prevalent at long-term care facilities, such as nursing homes. However, we know little of whether nursing home staff is exposed to MRSA via air and surfaces. We investigated whether staff members at nursing homes are colonised with and exposed to culturable MRSA, and assessed staff members’ self-reported knowledge of MRSA and compliance with infection hygiene guidelines. Five nursing homes with MRSA positive residents were visited in Copenhagen, Denmark. Personal bioaerosol exposure samples and environmental samples from surfaces, sedimented dust and bioaerosols were examined for MRSA and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) to determine occupational exposure. Swabs were taken from staffs’ nose, throat, and hands to determine whether they were colonised with MRSA. An online questionnaire about MRSA and infection control was distributed. No staff members were colonised with MRSA, but MRSA was detected in the rooms of the colonised residents in two out of the five nursing homes. MRSA was observed in air (n = 4 out of 42, ranging from 2.9–7.9 CFU/m3), sedimented dust (n = 1 out of 58, 1.1  103 CFU/m2/d), and on surfaces (n = 9 out of 113, 0.04–70.8 CFU/m2). The questionnaire revealed that half of the staff members worry about spreading MRSA to others. Identified aspects for improvement were improved availability and use of protective equipment, not transferring cleaning supplies (e.g., vacuum cleaners) between residents’ rooms and to reduce worry of MRSA, e.g., through education.

Received 6 July 2020 Revised 4 September 2020 Accepted 7 October 2020 Available online 13 November 2020 Keywords: Antibiotic resistance Airborne MRSA Bioaerosols Healthcare-associated infections Healthcare worker Occupational health

© The Author(s) 2020. This