On Alteration Rate Renewal Stage of Nuclear Waste Glass Corrosion

  • PDF / 1,326,083 Bytes
  • 10 Pages / 432 x 648 pts Page_size
  • 113 Downloads / 274 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


MRS Advances © 2020 Materials Research Society DOI: 10.1557/adv.2020.36

On Alteration Rate Renewal Stage of Nuclear Waste Glass Corrosion Michael I. Ojovan1 1

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Sheffield, UK; [email protected]

Abstract:

The three generically accepted stages of glass corrosion are reviewed with

focus on final stage termed alteration rate renewal (or resumption) stage when the glass may re-start corroding with the rate similar to that at the initial stage. It is emphasized that physical state and physical changes that occur in the near-surface layers can readily lead to an effective increase of leaching rate which is similar to alteration rate renewals. Experimental data on long-term (during few decades) corrosion of radioactive borosilicate glass K26 designed to immobilize high-sodium operational NPP radioactive waste evidence on resumption-like effects of radionuclides (137,134Cs) leaching. The cause of that was however related not to chemical changes in the leaching environment but rather to physical state of glass surface due to formation of small cracks and new pristine glass areas in contact with water.

INTRODUCTION: Vitrification is one of the best solutions in providing safety of nuclear waste storage, transportation and final disposal [1-3]. France, India, Japan, Russia, Slovakia, South Korea, the UK and USA have currently vitrification facilities in operation for the immobilisation of high level nuclear waste (HLW) and low and intermediate level nuclear waste (LILW), with Germany having recently completed their HLW vitrification program [2-6]. Table 1 gives data on HLW vitrification programs (see [2] for details). Except for alkali-aluminophosphate glass used in Russia, borosilicate glass has been universally selected as the vitreous wasteform to immobilize HLW [5, 6] whereas some LILW waste streams such as legacy waste accumulated from various nuclear development programs are preferable immobilized using bespoke selected silicate or phosphate systems better suited for particular waste compositions.

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Gothenburg University Library, on 28 Jan 2020 at 14:25:51, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2020.36

Table 1 Operational data of HLW vitrification programmes Country (Facilities)

Performance

France (R7/T7, AVM)

8252, 291106 TBq to 2019

USA (DWPF, WVDP, WTP)

7870 tonnes, 2.7106 TBq to 2012

Russia (EP-500)

6200 tonnes, 23.8106 TBq to 2010

UK (WVP)

2200 tonnes, 33106 TBq to 2012

Belgium (Pamela)

500 tonnes, 0.5106 TBq. Completed.

Japan, Tokai

70 tonnes, 0.4106 Ci* to 2007

Germany (Karlsruhe)

55 tonnes, 0.8106 TBq. Completed.

India (WIP, AVS, WIP)

28 tonnes, 0.26106 Ci to 2012

Slovakia (Bohunice)

1.53 m3 to 2012

*1 Ci = 0.037 TBq

The long-term behaviour of nuclear waste glass in disposal environment is an important input feature in safety assessment programs and models used to assess the u