Patient preferences for development in MRI scanner design: a survey of claustrophobic patients in a randomized study
- PDF / 1,123,356 Bytes
- 11 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 69 Downloads / 185 Views
MAGNETIC RESONANCE
Patient preferences for development in MRI scanner design: a survey of claustrophobic patients in a randomized study Elisa Iwan 1 & Jinhua Yang 2,3 & Judith Enders 2 & Adriane Elisabeth Napp 4 & Matthias Rief 2 & Marc Dewey 2 Received: 27 April 2020 / Accepted: 1 July 2020 # The Author(s) 2020
Abstract Objective To investigate which magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner designs claustrophobic patients prefer. Material/methods We analyzed questionnaires completed by 160 patients at high risk for claustrophobia directly after a scan in either a short-bore or open panoramic scanner as part of a prospective randomized trial Enders et al (BMC Med Imaging 11:4, 2011). Scanner preferences were judged based on schematic drawings of four scanners. Information on the diagnostic performance of the depicted scanners was provided, too. Results A majority of patients suggested upright open (59/160, 36.9%) and open panoramic (53/160, 33.1%) before short-bore designs (26/160, 16.3%, for all p < 0.001) for future development. When asked about patients’ preferred scanner choice for an upcoming examination, information about a better diagnostic performance of a short-bore scanner significantly improved its preference rates (from 6/160 to 49/160 or 3.8 to 30.5%, p < 0.001). Patients with a claustrophobic event preferred open designs significantly more often than patients without a claustrophobic event (p = 0.047). Patients scanned in a short-bore scanner in our trial preferred this design significantly more often (p = 0.003). Noise reduction (51/160, 31.9%), more space over the head (44/ 160, 27.5%), and overall more space (33/160, 20.6%) were the commonest suggested areas of improvement. Conclusion Patients at high risk for claustrophobia visually prefer open- over short-bore MRI designs for further development. Education about a better diagnostic performance of a visually less-attractive scanner can increase its acceptance. Noise and space were of most concern for claustrophobic patients. This information can guide individual referral of claustrophobic patients to scanners and future scanner development. Key Points • Patients at high risk for claustrophobia visually favor the further development of open scanners as opposed to short- and closed-bore scanner designs. • Educating claustrophobic patients about a higher diagnostic performance of a short-bore scanner can significantly increase their acceptance of this otherwise visually less-attractive design. • A medical history of earlier claustrophobic events in a given MRI scanner type and focusing on the features “more space” and “noise reduction” can help to guide referral of patients who are at high risk for claustrophobia. Keywords Claustrophobia . Magnetic resonance imaging . Questionnaire
Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07060-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. * Marc Dewey [email protected] 1
Departement of Anaesthesiology, Charité Berli
Data Loading...
