Performance of discrete, reciprocal, and cyclic movements of the ipsilesional upper limb in individuals after stroke

  • PDF / 835,601 Bytes
  • 9 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 102 Downloads / 206 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


RESEARCH ARTICLE

Performance of discrete, reciprocal, and cyclic movements of the ipsilesional upper limb in individuals after stroke Débora B. Carvalho1,2 · Sandra M. S. F. Freitas1 · Flavia A. D. Alencar1 · Maria Liliane Silva1 · Sandra R. Alouche1  Received: 15 May 2019 / Accepted: 24 July 2020 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Abstract Aiming movements of the upper limbs can be classified either as discrete, or reciprocal, or cyclic. The control of these movements after a stroke can be affected. The aim of this experimental, cross-sectional study was to characterize the performance of these movements after the right and left hemisphere chronic stroke. Thirty-six individuals aged between 40 and 70 years, right-handed, were allocated into three groups (control, right stroke, and left stroke). Participants were asked to perform aiming movements on a tablet. Individuals after stroke performed the tasks only with their ipsilesional limb, while the control group performed movements with both limbs. The reaction and movement times, peak velocity, and the variability and error of the endpoint were analyzed. Individuals after stroke presented a worse performance in all movement classes as expected, but differently depending on the damaged hemisphere. Participants with right hemisphere damage showed larger endpoint errors, while those with left hemisphere damage had longer reaction and movement times. Both differences were seen consistently in discrete and reciprocal, but not in cyclic movements. Cyclic movements presented shorter latencies, were faster, and showed greater endpoint errors when compared to discrete and reciprocal movements. These results suggest that stroke affects differently the performance of discrete and reciprocal movements according to the hemisphere lesion side, but not in cyclic movements. Different levels of motor control among the three classes of movements by the nervous system may justify these results. Keywords  Hemispheric specialization · Arm · Psychomotor performance

Introduction Upper limbs are the basis for the execution and maintenance of the functional capabilities of the individual. According to the goal of the task, movements of upper limbs behave differently. Discrete, reciprocal, or cyclic movements are involved in different tasks and show distinct characteristics. For definitions, discrete movements directed to a target have an identifiable start and stop and are delimited by distinct postures when only negligible movement occurs at Communicated by Winston D Byblow. * Sandra R. Alouche [email protected]; [email protected] 1



Masters and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo – UNICID, Rua Cesário Galeno, 448/475 ‑ Tatuapé, São Paulo, SP 03071‑000, Brazil



School of Physical Therapy, Universidade Nove de Julho – UNINOVE, São Paulo, Brazil

2

the target endpoint (Hogan and Sternad 2007). Reciprocal movements constitute a typical sequential task composed of two discrete movements: one toward a target an