Performance of morphologic criteria for the diagnosis of cirrhosis in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis compar
- PDF / 855,624 Bytes
- 9 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 32 Downloads / 191 Views
HEPATOBILIARY
Performance of morphologic criteria for the diagnosis of cirrhosis in patients with non‑alcoholic steatohepatitis compared to other etiologies of chronic liver disease: effect of level of training and experience Roberto Cannella1,2 · Navya Dasyam1 · Su‑hun Seo3 · Alessandro Furlan1 · Amir A. Borhani1,4 Received: 13 May 2020 / Revised: 9 August 2020 / Accepted: 21 August 2020 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020
Abstract Purpose To compare the diagnostic performance of morphologic criteria for detection of cirrhosis in patients with alcoholic liver disease (ALD), hepatitis C (HCV), and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Methods One hundred patients (53 male) with different etiologies of chronic liver disease (NASH, n = 41; HCV, n = 39; and ALD, n = 20) and with different degrees of fibrosis on histopathologic examination (74 with cirrhosis) were retrospectively evaluated. Four readers (R1: fellowship-trained abdominal radiologist, R2: community attending radiologist, R3: senior radiology resident/research fellow, R4: junior radiology resident) analyzed the contrast-enhanced CTs for presence of commonly accepted morphologic changes of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Each reader assigned an overall score (using a 5-point scale) for possibility of cirrhosis based on liver morphology and features of portal hypertension. Diagnostic performance, sensitivity, and specificity for the diagnosis of cirrhosis were calculated and compared between different etiologies of chronic liver disease. Results Performance of readers was affected by their level of training. Less experienced readers had overall lower sensitivity for diagnosis of cirrhosis in NASH group (R3: 81.5%, R4: 63.0% compared to 96.3% for both R1 and R2). Sensitivities for detection of NASH cirrhosis significantly decreased for less experienced readers in the absence of ascites (R3: 75.0%, R4: 62.0%) or other features of portal hypertension (R3: 50.0%; R4: 0%). The specificity was consistently high among different etiologies and for all readers (85.7–100%). Inter-reader agreement for morphologic features ranged widely from fair to almost perfect (k: 0.23–0.85). Conclusion Cirrhotic changes in NASH are subtler and can be underestimated by less experienced readers. Keywords Non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases (NAFLD) · Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis · Cirrhosis · Computed tomography
Introduction * Roberto Cannella [email protected] 1
Department of Radiology ‑ Division of Abdominal Imaging, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
2
Section of Radiology ‑ BiND, University Hospital “Paolo Giaccone”, Via del Vespro 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy
3
Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
4
Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N Saint Clair St., Chicago, IL 60611, USA
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
Data Loading...
