Performance of the Kato-Katz method and real time polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of soil-transmitted helmin
- PDF / 1,161,246 Bytes
- 12 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 37 Downloads / 159 Views
Parasites & Vectors Open Access
RESEARCH
Performance of the Kato‑Katz method and real time polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of soil‑transmitted helminthiasis in the framework of a randomised controlled trial: treatment efficacy and day‑to‑day variation Ladina Keller1,2, Chandni Patel1,2, Sophie Welsche1,2, Tobias Schindler1,2, Eveline Hürlimann1,2 and Jennifer Keiser1,2*
Abstract Background: Accurate, scalable and sensitive diagnostic tools are crucial in determining prevalence of soil-transmitted helminths (STH), assessing infection intensities and monitoring treatment efficacy. However, assessments on treatment efficacy comparing traditional microscopic to newly emerging molecular approaches such as quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) are scarce and hampered partly by lack of an established diagnostic gold standard. Methods: We compared the performance of the copromicroscopic Kato-Katz method to qPCR in the framework of a randomized controlled trial on Pemba Island, Tanzania, evaluating treatment efficacy based on cure rates of albendazole monotherapy versus ivermectin-albendazole against Trichuris trichiura and concomitant STH infections. Day-today variability of both diagnostic methods was assessed to elucidate reproducibility of test results by analysing two stool samples before and two stool samples after treatment of 160 T. trichiura Kato-Katz positive participants, partially co-infected with Ascaris lumbricoides and hookworm, per treatment arm (n = 320). As negative controls, two faecal samples of 180 Kato-Katz helminth negative participants were analysed. Results: Fair to moderate correlation between microscopic egg count and DNA copy number for the different STH species was observed at baseline and follow-up. Results indicated higher sensitivity of qPCR for all three STH species across all time points; however, we found lower test result reproducibility compared to Kato-Katz. When assessed with two samples from consecutive days by qPCR, cure rates were significantly lower for T. trichiura (23.2 vs 46.8%), A. lumbricoides (75.3 vs 100%) and hookworm (52.4 vs 78.3%) in the ivermectin-albendazole treatment arm, when compared to Kato-Katz. Conclusions: qPCR diagnosis showed lower reproducibility of test results compared to Kato-Katz, hence multiple samples per participant should be analysed to achieve a reliable diagnosis of STH infection. Our study confirms that
*Correspondence: [email protected] 1 Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, 4051 Basel, Switzerland Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © The Author(s) 2020. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article
Data Loading...