Potentially inappropriate testing for vitamin D deficiency: a cross-sectional study in Switzerland

  • PDF / 413,559 Bytes
  • 8 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 67 Downloads / 167 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


RESEARCH ARTICLE

Open Access

Potentially inappropriate testing for vitamin D deficiency: a cross-sectional study in Switzerland Stefan Essig1* , Christoph Merlo1, Oliver Reich2 and Maria Trottmann3

Abstract Background: There is consensus that vitamin D supplementation is often indicated but population-based screening by laboratory testing for vitamin D deficiency is inadequate. Testing should be restricted to people at high risk of severe deficiency. This study describes the current lab testing for vitamin D deficiency in the adult population of Switzerland. Methods: We assessed Swiss health insurance data (SWICA) for incidence of lab testing for vitamin D levels, comparing the years 2015 and 2018. Claims were analyzed for associations between lab testing and age, sex, medical indications, insurance status and geographic location in multivariable regression analyses. We also estimated the costs of vitamin D testing. Results: Data from 200,043 and 200,046 persons for 2015 and 2018, respectively, were analyzed. Vitamin D level was tested in 14% of the sample population in 2015 and 20% in 2018. Testing increased by 69% for individuals aged 26–30. Testing was associated with being middle-aged to young senior citizens, female, medical indications (pregnancy, renal disease, osteoporosis, hyperparathyroidism, HIV, glucocorticoid intake), more chronic conditions, having a mandatory insurance with a low deductible, additional insurance coverage, and living in urban areas. We estimate that the total laboratory cost to mandatory insurance was about 90 million Swiss francs in 2018. Conclusions: Despite recommendations for routine vitamin D supplementation, vitamin D testing of low risk individuals is common and increasing in Switzerland. Keywords: Vitamin D, Vitamin D deficiency, Diagnosis, Medical overuse, Underuse, Standards, Evidence-based Medicine

Background Low vitamin D levels are common [1, 2]. However, there is no clear figure for the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency, as the cut-off between normal and low values varies and laboratory assays are not standardized [3]. Low serum levels of vitamin D (i.e., 25-hydroxyvitamin D) are a causal factor for fractures [4] and are associated * Correspondence: [email protected] 1 Institute of Primary and Community Care, Schwanenplatz 7, 6004 Luzern, Switzerland Full list of author information is available at the end of the article

with many other health issues such as heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and dementia [5–7]. According to Swiss guidelines, patients with (a high risk of) bone diseases, such as osteoporosis or hyperparathyroidism; older, obese, or dark-skinned people; pregnant and breastfeeding women with risk factors; patients with chronic renal disease, liver failure, malabsorption, granulomatous diseases; and patients who are taking certain drugs (anticonvulsants, glucocorticoids, antiretroviral, and others) should be tested [8]. These conditions justify a blood test, as the risk of seriously low levels is high [9, 10].

© The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This