Pro-choice and Pro-life Are Not Enough: An Investigation of Abortion Attitudes as a Function of Abortion Prototypes
- PDF / 675,937 Bytes
- 23 Pages / 439.37 x 666.142 pts Page_size
- 23 Downloads / 219 Views
Pro‑choice and Pro‑life Are Not Enough: An Investigation of Abortion Attitudes as a Function of Abortion Prototypes B. J. Rye1,2 · Angela Underhill2,3
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020
Abstract Attitudes toward abortion were investigated as being comprised of two dimensions: attitudes toward abortion as a procedure and attitudes toward choice. By separating the two dimensions as conceptually distinct, attitudinal groups expand beyond the traditional “pro-choice” and “pro-life” absolutist categories to include dilemma and regulated groups. Dilemma people are those who are negative toward abortion but positive toward choice. Regulated individuals are those who are not negative toward abortion but believe that abortion should be strictly controlled rather than an individual choice. People in these situationist positional groupings were hypothesized to hold different abortion attitudes and exhibit different individual difference profiles relative to those endorsing the absolutist perspectives regarding abortion. Using a sample of university student participants, the study results partially supported the existence of the dilemma and regulated attitudinal groups. As expected, those endorsing pro-choice and pro-life positions regarding abortion were different from each other on abortion attitudes as well as on a number of sexuality-related, gender-role attitude, and conservatism individual difference measures. Of note were the findings that the situationists (i.e., dilemma and regulated groups) tended to fall in between the two absolutist groups in relation to abortion attitudes and differed on the personality measures. It is insufficient to dichotomize attitudes toward abortion as either pro-life or pro-choice; this research suggests that, at minimum, there is a substantial intermediate group of situationists. By identifying and understanding this middle group, the issue of abortion may become less polarized and divisive. The situationists are a large proportion of attitude holders; this group may have a substantial impact on laws, regulations, human rights, and research surrounding abortion issues. Keywords Abortion · Attitudes · Moderates · Pro-choice · Pro-life
* B. J. Rye [email protected] Extended author information available on the last page of the article
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
B. J. Rye, A. Underhill
Introduction People who identify as pro-choice in abortion attitudes often stress the rights of the woman seeking an abortion. Those who identify as pro-life, in contrast, stress the rights of the fetus. The two opposing groups often frame the other in terms of broad stereotypes whereby pro-life individuals call pro-choice individuals “pro-abortion” while pro-choice individuals label pro-life people as “anti-choice.” However, conceptualizing abortion positions in this dichotomous way is probably oversimplifying a complex attitudinal issue. For example, Smith and Son (2013) documented that only about 8% of Americans would fall under an absolute pro-life position, and appr
Data Loading...
