Can preventive care activities in general practice be sustained when financial incentives and external audit plus feedba
- PDF / 415,480 Bytes
- 7 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 54 Downloads / 150 Views
STUDY PROTOCOL
Open Access
Can preventive care activities in general practice be sustained when financial incentives and external audit plus feedback are removed? ACCEPt-able: a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol Jane S. Hocking1*, Meredith Temple-Smith2, Mieke van Driel3, Matthew Law4, Rebecca Guy4, Liliana Bulfone5, Anna Wood1, Nicola Low6, Basil Donovan4, Christopher K. Fairley7, John Kaldor and Jane Gunn2
Abstract Background: Financial incentives and audit plus feedback on performance are two strategies commonly used by governments to motivate general practitioners (GP) to undertake specific healthcare activities. However, in recent years, governments have reduced or removed incentive payments without evidence of the potential impact on GP behaviour and patient outcomes. This trial (known as ACCEPt-able) aims to determine whether preventive care activities in general practice are sustained when financial incentives and/or external audit plus feedback on preventive care activities are removed. The activity investigated is annual chlamydia testing for 16- to 29-year-old adults, a key preventive health strategy within this age group. Methods/design: ACCEPt-able builds on a large cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) that evaluated a 3-year chlamydia testing intervention in general practice. GPs were provided with a support package to facilitate annual chlamydia testing of all sexually active 16- to 29-year-old patients. This package included financial incentive payments to the GP for each chlamydia test conducted and external audit plus feedback on each GP’s chlamydia testing rates. ACCEPt-able is a factorial cluster RCT in which general practices are randomised to one of four groups: (i) removal of audit plus feedback—continue to receive financial incentive payments for each chlamydia test; (ii) removal of financial incentive payments—continue to receive audit plus feedback; (iii) removal of financial incentive payments and audit plus feedback; and (iv) continue financial incentive payments and audit plus feedback. The primary outcome is chlamydia testing rate measured as the proportion of sexually active 16- to 29-year-olds who have a GP consultation within a 12-month period and at least one chlamydia test. Discussion: This will be the first RCT to examine the impact of removal of financial incentive payments and audit plus feedback on the chlamydia testing behaviour of GPs. This trial is particularly timely and will increase our understanding about the impact of financial incentives and audit plus feedback on GP behaviour when governments are looking for opportunities to control healthcare budgets and maximise clinical outcomes for money spent. The results of this trial will have implications for supporting preventive health measures beyond the content area of chlamydia. (Continued on next page)
* Correspondence: [email protected] 1 Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 3/207 Bouverie Street, Carlton 3053, VIC, Australia Full list of author informatio
Data Loading...
