Clinical outcomes in patients with left ventricle trabeculation or noncompaction
- PDF / 1,514,634 Bytes
- 11 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 21 Downloads / 242 Views
		    ORIGINAL PAPER
 
 Clinical outcomes in patients with left ventricle trabeculation or noncompaction Hyungseop Kim1   · In‑Cheol Kim1 · Jin‑Wook Chung2 Received: 24 June 2020 / Accepted: 1 September 2020 © Springer Nature B.V. 2020
 
 Abstract Trabeculation exhibits highly varied presentations, whereas noncompaction (NC) is a specific disease entity based arithmeti‑ cally on wall thickness. We aimed to evaluate the clinical implications of trabeculation and its relevance to outcomes. A total of 296 patients (age 63 ± 12 years; 64% men) with trabeculation who underwent echocardiography were retrospectively identi‑ fied between January 2011 and December 2012. Analyses were conducted on distinguished trabeculation which was divided into NC (maximum noncompacted/compacted ratio ≥ 2.0) or hypertrabeculation (HT) (ratio  3.0 before performing multivariable analysis. Interand intraobserver variability for the ratio of noncompacted to compacted layers was evaluated using the intraclass cor‑ relation coefficient (ICC) on 21 randomly selected trabecula‑ tion images. For intraobserver variability, the same observer evaluated the same image > 2 weeks later. For interobserver variability, the other observer, who was blinded to the results
 
 The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 
 
 Fig. 1  Determination of the maximal ratio of the noncompacted/ compacted layer in different types of underlying heart diseases. Illus‑ trative examples of noncompaction or hypertrabeculation include a hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with noncompaction (ratio of 2.96), b
 
 ischemic heart disease with noncompaction (ratio of 2.78), c dilated cardiomyopathy with noncompaction (ratio of 2.57), and d dilated cardiomyopathy with hypertrabeculation (ratio of 1.41). C compacted layer, NC noncompacted layer
 
 of the first observer, evaluated the trabeculation images. A p-value  Moderate MR, n (%)   > Moderate AR, n (%)   > Moderate TR, n (%)  Medications, n (%)   Antiplatelets   Anticoagulations   Beta-blockers
 
 All patients (n = 296)
 
 Hypertrabeculation (n = 123)
 
 Noncompaction (n = 173)
 
 p value
 
 62.50 ± 12.19 188 (63.5) 125.10 ± 19.09 72.76 ± 13.19 76.57 ± 13.57 80 (27.0) 27 (9.1) 139 (47.0) 90 (30.4) 70 (23.6)
 
 62.15 ± 11.39 79 (64.2) 127.29 ± 17.08 72.57 ± 11.85 77.6 ± 14.17 26 (21.1) 12 (9.8) 59 (48.0) 32 (26.0) 34 (27.6)
 
 62.74 ± 12.76 109 (63.0) 123.55 ± 20.31 72.9 ± 14.10 75.84 ± 13.12 54 (31.2) 15 (8.7) 80 (46.2) 58 (33.5) 36 (20.8)
 
 0.685 0.903 0.096 0.831 0.271 0.063 0.838 0.814 0.200 0.212
 
 39 (13.2) 7 (2.4) 81 (27.4) 10 (3.4) 65 (22.0) 95 (32.1) 39 (13.2) 33 (11.1) 23 (7.8)
 
 18 (14.6) 4 (3.3) 33 (26.8) 3 (2.4) 28 (22.8) 36 (28.3) 18 (14.6) 12 (9,8) 6 (4.9)
 
 21 (12.1) 3 (1.7) 48 (27.7) 7 (4.0) 37 (21.4) 59 (34.1) 21 (12.1) 21 (12.1) 17 (9.8)
 
 0.602 0.455 0.895 0.530 0.778 0.449 0.602 0.578 0.129
 
 5.62 ± 1.60 4.08 ± 1.48 0.93 ± 0.55 0.92 ± 0.17 47.8 ± 17.1 113.2 ± 17.5 59.8 ± 12.3 0.56 ± 0.65 5 (1.7) 4.27 ± 1.31
 
 5.51 ± 1.81 4.04 ± 1.28 0.93 ± 0.17 0.91 ± 0.17 48.8 ± 18.0 112.5 ± 16.3 58.3 ± 11.3 0.53 ± 0.55 1 (0.8) 4.16 ± 0.79
 
 5.71 ± 1.32 4.12 		
Data Loading...
 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	