Disability weights for the burden of oral disease in South Australia
- PDF / 246,845 Bytes
- 11 Pages / 610 x 792 pts Page_size
- 106 Downloads / 186 Views
BioMed Central
Open Access
Research
Disability weights for the burden of oral disease in South Australia David S Brennan1 and A John Spencer*2 Address: 1Senior Research Fellow, AIHW Dental Statistics and Research Unit, Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, Dental School, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Adelaide, South Australia and 2Professor, Social and Preventive Dentistry, AIHW Dental Statistics and Research Unit, Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, Dental School, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Adelaide, South Australia Email: David S Brennan - [email protected]; A John Spencer* - [email protected] * Corresponding author
Published: 03 September 2004 Population Health Metrics 2004, 2:7
doi:10.1186/1478-7954-2-7
Received: 03 February 2004 Accepted: 03 September 2004
This article is available from: http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/2/1/7 © 2004 Brennan and Spencer; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Oral diseaseBurden of diseaseEuroQolDisability weight
Abstract Background: Australian burden of disease estimates appeared inconsistent with the reported repetitive and ubiquitous nature of dental problems. The aims of the study were to measure the nature, severity and duration of symptoms for specific oral conditions, and calculate disability weights from these measures. Methods: Data were collected in 2001–02 from a random sample of South Australian dentists using mailed self-complete questionnaires. Dentists recorded the diagnosis of dental problems and provided patients with self-complete questionnaires to record the nature, severity and duration of symptoms using the EuroQol instrument. Data were available from 378 dentists (response rate = 60%). Results: Disability weights were highest for pulpal infection (0.069), caries (0.044) and dentinal sensitivity (0.040), followed by denture problems (0.026), periodontal disease (0.023), failed restorations (0.019), tooth fractures (0.014) and tooth wear (0.011). Aesthetic problems had a low disability weight (0.002), and both recall/maintenance care and oral hygiene had adjusted weights of zero. Conclusions: Disability weights for caries (0.044), periodontal disease (0.023) and denture problems (0.026) in this study were higher than comparable oral health conditions in the Australian Burden of Disease and Injury Study (0.005 for caries involving a filling and 0.014 for caries involving an extraction, 0.007 for periodontal disease, and 0.004 for edentulism). A range of common problems such as pulpal infection, failed restorations and tooth fracture that were not included in the Australian Burden of Disease and Injury Study had relatively high disability weights. The inclusion of a fuller range of oral health p
Data Loading...
