Effect of excess Au on antiphase domain growth in Cu 3 Au
- PDF / 467,386 Bytes
- 5 Pages / 612 x 792 pts (letter) Page_size
- 51 Downloads / 228 Views
		    microscopy, followed closely the procedures used in the earlier work on the stoichiometric alloy. ~'z Briefly, the alloys as illustrated in the partial phase diagram in Fig. i were disordered by quenching from 450~ into water and then aged at various temperatures within the Cu3Au I ordered phase region. The APD structures produced by various aging treatments were studied with a Hitachi HU-IIA electron microscope operating at I00 kV. Average APD sizes were determined from 110 dark field images obtained from grains having (Ii0} foil norreals. As in the previous work, 2 the APD sizes were measured by lineal analysis with a circular test line /~25 I
 
 I
 
 I
 
 I
 
 O{ ( D I S O R D E R E D ) 400
 
 o
 
 o
 
 375
 
 ttl nD 350 b-*E nlaJ 02r 325
 
 /
 
 ttl I--..
 
 EXPERIMENTAL
 
 PROCEDURE
 
 T h r e e n o n s t o i c h i o m e t r i c Cu3Au a l l o y s w e r e o b rained from E n g e l h a r d I n d u s t r i e s in the f o r m of a s r o l l e d s t r i p ~0.25 cm • 2.5 c m . C h e m i c a l a n a l y s e s r e c e i v e d with the a l l o y s showed them to contain 25.98, 27.94, and 31.46 at. pct Au. S p e c i m e n p r e p a r a t i o n and heat t r e a t m e n t , as well as the p r e p a r a t i o n of thin foils for e x a m i n a t i o n by t r a n s m i s s i o n e l e c t r o n
 
 300
 
 275
 
 250 15 C. L, RASE is with Central Foundry Division, General Motors Cor-
 
 poration, Saginaw,MI 48603. D. E, MIKKOLAis Professor of Metallurgical Engineering,MichiganTechnological University, Houghton, MI 49331. Manuscript submitted May 24, 1974. METALLURGICALTRANSACTIONSA
 
 ~ ud
 
 I
 
 20
 
 I
 
 I
 
 I
 
 25
 
 30
 
 35
 
 40
 
 ATOMIC PERCENTAu Fig. 1--Schematic of a portion of the phase diagram of Cu-Au system showing alloy compositions studied in the current investigation. VOLUME 6A, DECEMBER 1975-2267
 
 1 0 0 0 0
 
 r
 
 i
 
 i
 
 ,~,,ll
 
 i
 
 i
 
 ~
 
 li,~i~
 
 i
 
 I
 
 I
 
 i1,11E
 
 I
 
 11111'4
 
 P
 
 P Ill
 
 '
 
 Table I. Average Antiphase Domain Sizes for Initially Quenched CuaAu (Ref. 2) and CuaAu + Au Alloys given Various Annealing Treatments
 
 375~
 
 T i me, h
 
 Number o f Intercepts
 
 0.5 3 10 20 45 50 100 20O
 
 218 208 171 195 117 92 58
 
 looo
 
 350~
 
 /~ A
 
 Number of Intercepts
 
 133 310 624 892 1333 1800 270O
 
 298 244 236 -
 
 37
 
 D, A ~75 175 470 738 -
 
 Cu-25.98 At. Pct Au 375~
 
 cu-~s.ga."Ao}"~ A oV ;c~_ ~ .~ ~
 
 "!,~
 
 Cu-25 At. Pct Au
 
 100
 
 I
 
 3
 
 10 20 50 100 200
 
 157 640 537 681 353 496 464
 
 ~ /lllll
 
 I
 
 I
 
 I pl~l/~
 
 1
 
 I
 
 I
 
 I Illlll
 
 I
 
 10
 
 1QQ
 
 1000
 
 HOURS Fig. 2--Average antiphase domain size vs time for initially disordered Cu-25.98 pct Au annealed at 375 and 320~ Error bars indicate the range of sizes from different micrographs, while the point is the average of the sizes. f,
 
 320~ 10000
 
 1
 
 I
 
 0.1
 
 o
 
 182 368 714 1057 1458 2180 3343
 
 -
 
 i
 
 r
 
 , ,,,b,,
 
 ~
 
 i
 
 , ,,,11,
 
 I
 
 I
 
 ~ iEipllf
 
 756 1189 709
 
 I
 
 ,
 
 ~ ~,,i
 
 I
 
 I I [11
 
 //
 
 -
 
 365 511 718
 
 CU- 2 / Z ~ / ' ~ - 4 " 4 " -
 
 Cu-27.94 At. Pct Au 320 ~
 
 370~
 
 2
 
 3 10 20 50 100 200 400 613 813 1000
 
 434 385 679 490 887 599 433 257 314 276
 
 346 623 894 1421 2099 2959 3707 4475 4361 4551
 
 100
 
 -
 
 I
 
 I
 
 IIIIIII
 
 I
 
 I
 
 I IIIIIL
 
 [
 
 I
 
 I ILII		
Data Loading...
 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	