Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of left and right inferior frontal gyrus on creative divergent thinki

  • PDF / 1,309,129 Bytes
  • 14 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 37 Downloads / 180 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of left and right inferior frontal gyrus on creative divergent thinking are moderated by changes in inhibition control Radwa Khalil1   · Ahmed A. Karim1,2,3   · Angela Kondinska1 · Ben Godde1  Received: 16 October 2019 / Accepted: 4 May 2020 / Published online: 17 June 2020 © The Author(s) 2020

Abstract Divergent thinking (DT) as one component of creativity is the ability to search for multiple solutions to a single problem and is reliably tested with the Alternative Uses Task (AUT). DT depends on activity in the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), a prefrontal region that has also been associated with inhibitory control (IC). Experimentally manipulating IC through transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) led to alterations in DT. Here, we aimed at further examining such potential mediating effects of IC on DT (measured as flexibility, fluency, and originality in the AUT) by modulating IC tDCS. Participants received either cathodal tDCS (c-tDCS) of the left IFG coupled with anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) of the right IFG (L−R + ; N = 19), or the opposite treatment (L + R−; N = 21). We hypothesized that L + R− stimulation would enhance IC assessed with the Go NoGo task (GNGT), and that facilitated IC would result in lower creativity scores. The reversed stimulation arrangement (i.e., L− R +) should result in higher creativity scores. We found that tDCS only affected the originality component of the AUT but not flexibility or fluency. We also found no effects on IC, and thus, the mediation effect of IC could not be confirmed. However, we observed a moderation effect: inhibition of left and facilitation of right IFG (L−R +) resulted in enhanced flexibility and originality scores, only when IC performance was also improved. We conclude that inducing a right-to-left gradient in IFG activity by tDCS is efficient in enhancing DT, but only under conditions where tDCS is sufficient to alter IC performance as well. Keywords  Creativity · Divergent thinking (DT) · AUT (alternative uses task) · Fluency · Originality · Flexibility · tDCS · IFG Abbreviations AP Action potentials AUT​ Alternative uses task DT Divergent thinking EFs Executive functions GNGT Go No Go task Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (https​://doi.org/10.1007/s0042​9-020-02081​-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. * Radwa Khalil [email protected]; rkhalil@jacobs‑university.de 1



Department of Psychology and Methods, Jacobs University Bremen, Bremen, Germany

2



Department of Health Psychology and Neurorehabilitation, SRH Mobile University, Riedlingen, Germany

3

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany



IC Inhibitory control IFG Inferior frontal gyrus PFC Prefrontal cortex rDLPFC Right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex tDCS Transcranial direct current stimulation

Introduction Creativity and innovative thinking in the arts, science, stage performance, the commerc

Data Loading...

Recommend Documents