Efficiency and reproducibility of the right ventricular long axis imaging plane for the evaluation of right ventricle
- PDF / 101,724 Bytes
- 2 Pages / 610 x 792 pts Page_size
- 23 Downloads / 178 Views
BioMed Central
Open Access
Poster presentation
Efficiency and reproducibility of the right ventricular long axis imaging plane for the evaluation of right ventricle Abhishek Chaturvedi*, Lee Mitsumori, Joseph Whitnah, Kent M Koprowicz, Florence Sheehan, Theodore J Dubinsky, Kelly Branch, Karen Stout and Jeffrey H Maki Address: University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA * Corresponding author
from 13th Annual SCMR Scientific Sessions Phoenix, AZ, USA. 21-24 January 2010 Published: 21 January 2010 Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2010, 12(Suppl 1):P78
doi:10.1186/1532-429X-12-S1-P78
Abstracts of the 13th Annual SCMR Scientific Sessions - 2010
Meeting abstracts - A single PDF containing all abstracts in this Supplement is available here. http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/files/pdf/1532-429X-11-S1-infoThis abstract is available from: http://jcmr-online.com/content/12/S1/P78 © 2010 Chaturvedi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Introduction There are limitations when using the short axis imaging plane (SAX) for assessing RV function, as the tricuspid valve may not be clearly identified. An imaging plane aligned with the horizontal long axis of the RV (RVHLA) could improve visualization of the basal RV, making endocardial contour tracing easier.
number of slices, analysis time, and the RV metrics were then compared between readers and between imaging planes (SAX vs RVHLA).
Results
To illustrate the prescription of a horizontal long axis imaging plane for right ventricular (RV) functional analysis; and to compare the time required and the variability of right ventricular functional assessment obtained with this RV long axis plane with analyses performed with a conventional left ventricular short axis (SAX) stack of cine images.
The average number of slices needed to cover the RV and the contour drawing times (CDT) for both readers were significantly lower with the RHLA cine stack (number of slices 9.6 ± 1.3; CDTs 7.8 ± 1.8 minutes), when compared to the SAX set of images (10.5 ± 1.4 slices; CDT 9.1 ± 1.6 minutes). Bland-Altman analysis performed between reviewers revealed lower mean differences (reviewer 1 reviewer 2), narrower limits of agreement, and smaller coefficient-of-variations (CoV) for the RV functional metrics obtained with the RHLA imaging plane when compared to the SAX cine stacks (table 1).
Methods
Conclusion
Thirty-four clinical cardiac MRI exams that contained two cine bFFE stacks - one in the SAX orientation, the second aligned with the horizontal long axis of the RV (RVHLA) were evaluated. Two radiologists independently derived RV volumes on each of these two cine stacks of images for the 34 exams. Readers recorded the number of slices needed and the time required to manually draw the endocardial contours to perform the RV functional analysis for each cine stack. The resulting RV functional metrics obtained included the end diastolic volume (EDV), end systolic volume (ESV), and ejection fraction (EF). The
In this study, RV functional analysis performed with an ima
Data Loading...
