Fragile Families and the Marriage Agenda
Many people see government involvement in family policy as a response to popular concerns that the American family is in a state of crisis. One of the primary concerns with "fragile" families (one parent – usually mother) is economic: Poverty rates for si
- PDF / 14,390,531 Bytes
- 246 Pages / 441 x 666 pts Page_size
- 11 Downloads / 149 Views
Lori Kowaleski-Jones Nicholas H. Wolfinger Editors
Fragile Families and the ~ a r r i a Agenda ~e With 3 1 Figures
Q - Springer
Lori Kowaleski-Jones Department o f Family a n d Consumer Studies University o f U t a h 225 S o u t h 1400 East Salt Lake City, UT 841 12-0080 USA lori. [email protected]
Nicholas H. Wolfinger Department o f Family a n d Consumer Studies University o f U t a h 225 S o u t h 1400 East Salt Lake City, UT 841 12-0080 USA
[email protected]
Library of Congress Control Number: 2005926769
Printed on acid-free paper.
O 2006 Springer Science+BusinessMedia, Inc. All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, Inc., 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now know or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights. Printed in the United States of America.
(SPIIEB)
Contributing Authors
Mikaela J. Dufur Department of Sociology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah Rachel Dunifon Department of Policy Analysis and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York Paul Florsheim Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah Renata Forste Department of Sociology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah Lori Kowaleski-Jones Department of Family and Consumer Studies, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah Matthew McKeever Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, Massachusetts Sara S. McLanahan Department of Sociology and the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey
vi
Contributing Authors
Brent C. Miller Department of Family, Consumer, and Human Development, Utah State University, Logan, Utah Dawne Moon Department of Sociology, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California Le Q. Ngu Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah Rayna A. Sage Department of Family, Consumer, and Human Development, Utah State University, Logan, Utah Kelly P. Trontman Department of Sociology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah Lynn D. Wardle J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah Jaye Cee Whitehead Department of Sociology, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California Bryan Winward Department of Family, Consumer, and Human Development, Utah State University, Logan, Utah Nicholas H. Wolfinger Department of Family and Consumer Studies, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
Preface
Lori Kowaleski-Jones and Nicholas H. Wolfingerl 'Depart
Data Loading...